livingonvideo
living on video
livingonvideo

Why does the AV Club always insist on picking the lowest hanging fruit possible? “Here’s red meat for our progressive readers, chomp chomp.” Who is learning, here, and what?

This reaction always gives me pleasant memories of my first date with my my wife.

It’s a trend that can be emotionally draining; I remember trying to read ‘Closing Time’, the follow-up to ‘Catch-22', and being unable to get more than a few pages in because an old, bitter Yossarian was too heart-breaking after his hopeful flight at the end of the original novel. But that said, one of the best

I think JO JO’s Bizarre adventure does it the way your looking for. Not that i think either is best but in Jo Jo joseph jostar is a creative prick who gets by with charisma and tricks later he ages and his grandson sees him as still a douche but hes just as silly but smarter to make up for his lack of physical body.

Quality aside, I don’t think Indy belongs on that list. I would, however, add Han Solo and, one of the earliest offenders, Jim Phelps. 

The whole thing has such a “well actually” vibe to it. Well actually, if Laurie Strode had lived through all of that she would be fucked up for life and probably some sort of paranoid shut-in. (pushes up glasses)

>I’m feeling some serious fatigue over the current “your childhood hero became a miserable shell and/or failure” trend.

Aw man...they’re totally gonna Last Jedi Picard, aren’t they? Sad face. 

You EXPECT something? Eat a bucket of fucks you shit eating dickhead!

“It’s just basically saying to heck with society, to heck with law and order,” Michelle replies.

I have no idea how you can possibly describe anything I said as being an ass. Like, none. I have no idea where this kind of hostility comes from.

I skipped right past the whole article to leave this comment, and I only clicked on the article to make this comment. So I’d appreciate not talking about Endgame, which I haven’t seen. But the header image for the article, which is on the front page of the site, has two spoilers in it. Technically two, I guess,

Eh, I did love “I’ve got nothing to prove to you.”

I’m glad we got to talk about this.

As they found a way to resurrect Gamora (mentioned only because it matches one key constraint so well), I’m sure they could have found some way to do this that didn’t result in the one “signatory” avenger - the only female, the only one deprived of a feature film, and the one who was

As much as I didn’t really take to Lebowski Thor, Hemsworth does stellar work here.

Where I was comfortable with it fitting the form is in how she died a plot device. I think you could even make a credible argument that she might have been born a plot device too: show up, look sexy, say a few soft feminine things to the Hulk, have no movie of your own, and die in this movie ignoring the stakes set up

Yeah! Except when you put it in a glove and also after you take it out for some reason. I wonder if anyone thought about how he’s supposed to get it back in Jane Foster. 

Thor’s retelling of Thor 2 is great. They knew no one would remember, and Rudd is the only one who’s enjoying the story.

This is the best possible version of an article like this. Non-spoilery headline, many warnings, tagged correctly. Of what should they be ashamed?