liveinndforgotherburnerkey
LiveinNDforgotherburnerkey
liveinndforgotherburnerkey

Oh shit, I’m sorry, I totally remember that time that I personally had anything to do with any of that, yep...because I have that power...and the non-natives have control over what happens on the reservation...and every single white person in the history of ever is part of a giant monolith that act in unison like some

Agenda? You mean to have an intelligent conversation on this topic that is not one sided? I knew before I started really that it wasn’t possible as you all have your minds already made up, but I am a glutton for punishment I guess.

Concern trolling? That is when you say you are concerned for safety but really just mean you don’t like something? Like yeah, I hope they all freeze to death and we have to go dig their bodies out of snow banks in the spring? (sarcasm btw).

I suppose you can read it that way. Perhaps I just didn’t because we are used to getting such notices and know what it means practically rather than what the words technically say. For instance, all of Bismarck-Mandan (and most of western ND) is/was last night under a no travel advisory and it also has a reference to

1) see definition of terrorism. the act of the pig head on a stick while blocking a public roadway is designed to intimidate and scare people to achieve their desired result.

ter·ror·ism

How about a pig head on a stick?

I should have said hippie millenials maybe? Or maybe just troublemakers? Eco-terrorist is the term I hear used when referring to those who use violence to further their environmental cause...perhaps that is the wrong term and if so my apologies...

I agree...and 90% of the people I know fully realize that the Sioux people are not the problem here... they have every right to peacefully protest, which they were doing, before the out of state (mostly white) eco-terrorists arrived...

Sorry to reply to you so many times. This

Here is the text of the actual order. Says nothing about ordering them to refuse services. Says they will likely not be able to reach that area in the event of a storm emergency.

After “local residents raised concerns”. You mean by, like, showing up at the public meetings? The people they should be mad at are the tribal leadership who refused to go to the meetings (they went to 1 early on I believe, correct me if I am wrong). Refusing to participate in the process does not mean that the

True, there is a huge difference there, but the local article (I will post the Fargo paper because Bismarck makes you pay to read) does not say that. It says that determinations of whether services could reach them would be made on a case by case basis. I will have to see if I can find the official order itself...

I dont know why this posted twice. Sorry for the repetition.

The ACOE determined that north of Bismarck was not the best location. Not the citizens.

You are correct. He cannot force them off of federal land. But he can order the highways closed due to unsafe conditions (actually the DOT usually does that but it is his authority) and since the nearest hospital is in Bismarck there would be no way to get someone there in a timely manner if the roads are closed. As I

No. What he is saying is: If you choose to stay we cannot guarantee that emergency services will be able to reach you. It is quite common at this time of year for roads, even highways, even the Interstate to be closed due to weather conditions. If you live in a location that is not a city or town (ie farmers for

My kid works retail and had to work ON Thanksgiving...said it was ridiculously busy too...

Supposedly the orange thing goes back to St. Nicholas...