But could they? The freaking President of the god damn United States couches his words when talking about gun control. I don’t know if 4 NBA players could change anything , but I would bet they would sacrifice everything to do so.

Ugh don’t read his statement. He blames it on lack of confidence with women

22 life year sentences but could be out in 25 years.

GROOP sex?

Just another bullet-ridden day in the good ole US of A.

Fuck zoos.

Trump’s response:

I’d say Goldfinch

she’s really the only reporter who’s gone after him in any sort of way- most of the others either fawn over him or let him babble on say whatever. Throw in the fact she’s a woman and Trump thinking he’s a Man’s Man with every sexist connotation that comes with it and there you go.

Exactly. She doesn’t agree with him and he can’t call her “ugly”. So of course, he labels her “crazy”. What a psycho.

I think there is something weird and psychosexual in his inability to take criticism from her. He cannot abide her not liking him - her dissent. At first, it seemed like the usual politician versus pesky reporter war, but it’s not. There’s something about her being female that he cannot stand.

Yes. This is one of the worst things. How dare that asshole make Fox News look reasonable?

Paraphrasing a comment from another poster:

This is actually pretty interesting- thinking about people like my mom and all her friends. She LOVES Megyn Kelly (and is always watching Fox News) and Donald Trump. I think there probably is a lot of overlap. Her Facebook is half entertaining and half depressing. I should post a link to the Fox News story on her…

I was reading a legal expert interview at SI.com and he said the same thing. By bringing it to trial, they’re getting exposed for whatever culpability they had in this incident, and even worse, the “you got more famous after you were psychologically violated” defense is a massive PR hit that is self-inflicted. And as…

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Here’s the thing, journalists could actually do their damn job and fact check republicans when they make claims that there is no precedent that a president in his last year in office gets to nominate a supreme court candidate, instead of asking the question like it’s a legitimate idea. I am sick and tired of…

“Davis said the drug charges on his record prevent him from being able to get a job,”

You’ve missed the point if you think anyone is saying you shouldn’t be concerned about the direction the country is going or that you should be passive. The point is to examine WHY you back a certain candidate for the less overt biases that are inherent in support. And look at who you think is best capable of…