You haven’t heard of GamerGhazi have you? Anti-GamerGate is really a thing. And it’s even crazier and wackier than GamerGate.

Why should I take that seriously after watching GG spend the last 8+ months making up everything from animal abuse to literal bestiality and throwing it at their targets?

Twitter has 302 million monthly visitors. 77% of which are in the US.

Ah, again the “oh, they’re only using a woman,” like Hoff Sommers isn’t an individual and will just go along with whatever a group of neckbearded geeks will say, right? Isn’t it crazy how the people attacking GamerGate are usually just closet misogynists in reality?

The internet is diverse, who knew? Well, clearly misandrist racists like you don’t, but others might.

You mean the group that is comprised of trans, gay, bi, white, black, asian and any manner of people in it? I get that it’s easy to think so, but Gamergaters aren’t the boogeyman.

There’s been zero evidence connecting Gamergate to any of the threats that Wu or Sarkeesian have claimed to have encountered, yet it hasn’t stopped you or anyone on Kotaku from just buying into them.

Are you sure you’re not talking about Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu and Zoe Quinn now?

You don’t really know what you’re talking about, do you? Gamergate as it is, is filled with all kinds of people. Be it men, women, trans, bi, gay, anything. Hoff Sommers is widely respected, Milo is gay, and a huge part of the active correspondents on twitter and reddit are very, very diverse.

I remember when it was suggested (with somewhat believable evidence) that both Wu and Sarkeesian were doing the same kind of fake threats towards themselves, and everyone lost their minds. Funny to see that for “the other side” it’s only a valid accusation.

HBB is on the record on what they’ve done, right down to the voice recording of the panel they’re accused of disrupting. All of the evidence backs up their claim that no disruption took place.

HBB did none of those things either, so here we are.

What’s even more disgusting is that right after Jason Schreider’s little tantrum about how everyone is picking on poor Kotaku, despite Kotaku being so great and open and well balanced, this article completely refuses to report all information and instead once again paints the picture as a one sided black and white…

It’s worked out for Sarkeesian, Wu and Quinn so far.

Projecting is not the same as knowing.

Of course you do, because if you didn’t get a chance to completely stick your head in the sand, you might actually learn something. Much easier to just ignore it.

Absolute lie. Why would you even resort to it when there is an actual audio recording of the panel that proves you wrong?

The bubble you live in is hilariously showing.

Getting permission to speak during a panel is now being disruptive? It’s hilarious how people are ENTIRELY ignoring the fact that the panel was recorded, including the so called “disruption.”

Of course, it isn’t just about a stub, as Patricia wants to make it appear. She has a history of doing this stuff, which is why it’s being pointed out in the first place and why she had to initially go and acknowledge in multiple(!) articles retroactively that she wasn’t forthcoming with details. It’s the same thing…