My gods that is hideous. Neither cute nor tough.

You got it, 92 was new bodystyle but no decklid spoiler. 93 got the spoiler and also added an automatic transmission option. My opinion 93 is when they transitioned it from sleeper-ish sport sedan to obvious high power option for highway cruising.

You say with no sense of irony despite unions and the UAW waging a similar information war.

Air Force Once?

Pure? Maybe before the mainstream blog blogmedia covered it. Used to be a time that replacing the stock fasteners with aluminum (only need to last one race) and pulling the seat padding out of a $50 steel bodied basic model from Staples could put you in the top 10.

It does?

Zed-28?

C’mon Henry, it’s 4 in the fucking morning, can’t it wait?

My gods do people struggle with Final Jeopardy wagering. I saw one recap that said his Final wager was “uncharacteristically low” as if he bet low from the lead and lost by getting overtaken

Duh-Doy.

I know from experience that if your car is nice and banged up on the outside, people seem to think twice about playing that game of chicken to try to squeeze out one more place in line at a legitimate merge point. Just slide right in, because it’s your car or mine, and mine has already been run into a wall once, so…

I gave you a second star, which of course means no one is really reading (or maybe comprehending) your post. I love when people’s first instinct to problems like an extreme wealth gap is to look toward government to fix it.

And the thing about the Pryce incident is that, although a bad decision and a worse outcome, at least they were headed to help a driver whose car was on fire and he had yet to get out.

I wondered if this story would spring memories of Glacier Girl for anyone else as I was scrolling through pictures.

Can I take odds on if the New Job=New Car letter author will get to 65 and realize that they can’t retire on Social Security income alone, but that there was “nothing they could do” to save more during their working career?

The U-2 was shot down. It didn’t (and couldn’t) bomb anything.

My bad, that comment was intended for Jayden, I just failed in selecting the correct reply button. 

By the way, huge kudos for correctly noting that the Taurus was originally offered with a 5-speed. The oft forgotten/ignored MT-5 trim was only offered with the base 2.5L HSC 4cyl similar to what was in the Tempo. By all accounts, the 88hp edition was not a mover (in speed or sales), despite getting to help it through…

The new SHO, although a much stronger performer than this one (it has 25 years on this one afterall so it will be more comfy and safer to boot) is just not the same car. It is much too bulky and no option to row your own. As much as it seems silly to say Taurus and Driver’s Car in the same sentence, the original SHO…

I owned a pretty beat on ‘92 SHO that I bought for $750 that I drove pretty hard for a couple years before something gave up that I couldn’t figure out, but it wouldn’t make any power. I still think about rebuying one although I admit I probably never will.