No it’s not rape. Whether you like it or not. It is not rape. In Neveda and all the sane states in America and in civilized Europe the age of consent is 16 and sometimes 16 as was mentioned somewhere in this thread. It is because in a sane world people know that 16 year olds know exactly what they are doing when it…

Please. These same people take their daughters shopping at Victoria’s Secret at 12 years old. I see them in there regularly and am astonished. 16 year olds today lie, murder, steal, do drugs. They spend their time on tinder and the internet. It was no different then. Teenagers are having sex whether their parents like…

Because teenagers are never responsible for their own decisions. Except they can drive a car at 16, get a permit to fire a gun at 12, and would be tried as an adult for crimes at as young as 14 such as murder, robbery, etc. Yet they are not mature enough to decide to have sex. Baloney. Utter baloney.

This case was never about justice only about money. And when one is being sued they have the right to and must defend themselves especially against allegations that have not been proven to be true. Save the moral outrage. The lawyer is doing his job and he is right. He was only using statements made by the woman…

According to the Los Angeles Times article of this week it is an allegation of the plaintiff who has offered no proof of said allegations.