While I didn’t send it, I honestly agree wholeheartedly with that email. You had gotten over the bad side, David.

I have no time for JK’s TERFness but she’s kind of in the right here? I don’t think the original tweet was something so incredible as to warrant a virulent response, because I agree with the “one size don’t fit all” message. 

What happened, was today so boring that they weren’t any news? This is from yesterday and the “latest” that appears to me.

How could someone blessed with the gift of sight think that those baggy suits ever looked good?

Now I’m not up to date with this controversy, is JK thesis that trans women aren’t women or that they are women, but shouldn’t be (ie, shouldn’t exist).

T_D was dead, so yeah, not big news really. r/GenderCritical is the important thing, it was the gathering point of truly awful people (full of TERFs), as was r/rigthwingLBGT. So yeah, good news today.

Mel Gibson making antisemitic remarks? Say it ain’t so!

I’m honestly sorry this is happening to you David but about time, this was getting ridiculous. You were getting flanderized. And I doubt you were actually going to fix the cars on your own volition, so I guess an order to do it or else is the best thing it could happen to you.

So is this pro gusanos? Hard pass.

After reading his “apology” like 3 times I still have no idea what the fuck is he on about. What “lifestyle” was he caught up in? The pedo lifestyle? Until the “that being said...” it was a normal denial of things, but it goes south very fast after that.

Ugh, TERFs. Fuck them. I will try to ignore what JKR has said and continue to read HP because I’m a hypocrite and don’t have a spine, and also because I think she’s the only author to lose their “billionaire” status by giving to charity (unless they’re, like, TERF charities but I don’t think they exist) so, people are…

The problematic angle for me is the back, it’s too... feature-less. It looks like a bad chinese copy of itself. The rest is meh, but good enough for the time I guess. It’s inoffensive.

Yeah, I can see that maybe unimportant was unfair, pedestrian maybe it’s the better descriptor. I just don’t feel a connection to it, there’s not enough to keep me invested in the characters. And also, I’m sorry, but that kid was really annoying.

Hot take: That montage was poignant and amazing, but the rest of the movie... just ok. Even ok-. It’s not that it can’t reach the emotional depth that they set up in the first minutes (it can’t, but that’s not the criticism), it’s just that in the end the plot is so... unimportant, to say a word. People just do stuff…

The thing that literally bothers me the most about the story is that woman. Who the hell styles their name Denice with a C? I’m guessing it’s pronounced like Denise but I still would name her Deniche like italian just to mess with her.

Uhm, ok. First of all, whore. Second of all, wrong. Third of all, MU was to MI what Cars 3 was to Cars 1 (we don’t talk about 2)

Monsters, Inc. The best Pixar movie, fight me.

Look, I know where you’re coming from. I see how what I say can be construed as “incel talk”, but I want to assure you, I’m not. I’m gay, I have a healthy sex life, I don’t hate women. What I do hate is people using excuses for murderers based on gender. Specially this case. And it’s not even that *any* murder can´t…

he is entitled to trade in his spouse for a younger model.

Oh FFS. Being ugly is no excuse for MURDER. You understand that, right? That she killed two people to death, one the father of her childen, whose only crime was... leaving her? I find it disgusting that so many people are excusing her based on “oh poor Beth, her husband left her...”. Well, many people are dumped and…