Damnit... that isn’t a flying car. It’s a driving plane.

Yeah... io9 used to have the wide variety of stuff... now they just crammed it all in under the giz banner or something...

I would've even accepted a Wikipedia reference in the article.

It isn’t even gizmodo anymore.... it’s basically just jezebel but with science-y things... who cares about facts and details.

How about some scientific details regarding realistic voltage an amp-hour estimations??

100-150kW is the baseline for any amount of militarily applicable destructive power. It’s the LOW end of the spectrum.

I cannot believe these stupid seminars are legal. let alone the fire walking.

You guys NEED to produce an article, utilizing actual experts, that can relay how massively primitive the Tesla Autodrive system is relative to a true self-driving car like Google’s.

Something about stimulating the production of stem cells that makes me worry about cancer.....

The thing is, nobody would allow that sort of surveillance.

I know this IS gawker were talking about.... but please try to distinguish between a simplistic lane maintenance and braking function that ties in with GPS (Tesla et all), and a Google Self-driving car.

Tesla isnt a goddamn self-driving car.

Well, portrait mode is better if you need to capture scenes that fit better in a portrait frame.

Pffft. God forbid a heterosexual woman should have any muscle.

There are many cases that go undetected, AND it doesn’t change the fact that you’re eating LIVE WORMS that are actively trying to grow inside you.

FUCK THAT.

Just chuck a glob of epoxy at it.

Why the heck would you worship a general?

There were too many videos to choose from. You can’t turn your head without seeing one coming down to the ground in a fireball.

It’s not like you can’t afford a cup in all honesty, as far as the real cost goes... the price is jacked up to create a sense of greater value and quality. Their target audience is more than happy to blow every penny on something plastered in bullshit jargon.