liquidh0e
liquidh0e
liquidh0e

Unfortunately, that's everywhere. I myself have cried about refs too many times. It's just so damn easy.

Poor baby, you ok? I'm not sure what an "undeserved superbowl win" is, but I guess I'll have to take your word that it's somehow less than a regular superbowl win.

.

Just to be clear here: The NCAA denies the waiver request based on whether or not the letter of the law/rule/policy was broken. The appeal process is when the NCAA assigns an individual to the case to determine the facts and circumstances as to whether overturning the original decision is appropriate. A lot of people

I never said there wasn't a difference between getting banned and getting cut, did I? Both are bad things. Getting banned is infinitely worse. I never said it wasn't. I just re-read my post, and I never once came within a planet of saying there wasn't a difference between the two.

Right. Because people that are cut from professional teams because of controversy can always find jobs and aren't blackballed by the other teams right? Right?

Go back to Jezebel

I would gladly risk life-threatening/altering injuries (which, by the way, for a defensive linemen is probably so small it would read zero on a calculator) for a few years to receive an approximate 30,000% raise.

Football is a vicious game that, as Chris Cooley points out, offers its players very little in the way of financial or career stability

Disregard

Disregard

Actually, if you look at the gif above, you can see his right arm gets completely blocked by Molina's left arm and comes no where near the plate. Whatever that is (shadow from the glove, maybe the catcher's equipment) it's not from Ross. Sorry Sean, but that's not any part of Ross touching the plate. Compare the

It's not his hand on the plate. Look at the replay above and look where Ross's arm ends up. His right arm ends up on Molina. The screenshot above clearly shows his left arm no where near the plate. I don't know what that is, but I don't think it's any part of Ross. I think this is a good call.

Major controversies? That's quite an exaggeration. Do you watch NFL football? Yeah, there are missed calls and questionable calls throughout every NFL game; but instant replay/coach's challenges has removed 95% of the calls that WOULD be controversial because they are obvious misses.

You're right in that "I could" does not mean "I would" or "It will". But, "I could" means if the opportunity presented itself, it would be done.

We'll have to agree to disagree. Saying "I could beat the crap out of you" and "I'd like to think if we fought I would beat the crap out of you" are not the same thing. The first is a definitive statement statement that says yes, if it happened, I could do it and it would be done. The 2nd statement is more of a

Sorry but your way off. You can try all the wordsmithing you want, but there is some minor trolling in the way the title was presented by Deadspin. Not worth getting crazy about, but the spirit of the comments do not jive. Saying "I could hit 50 home runs in a MLB season" is not the same thing as "Man, I'd like to

So then why isn't the answer for MEN to stop drinking? Because that's not the culture we live in. We don't expect men to change their bad behavior, we expect women to change THEIR behavior so that men don't behave badly. And that's outrageous.

She says that, but the whole column is about what WOMEN should be doing to keep themselves from becoming victims.

I agree that there is somewhat of a grey area/line between victim blaming and giving advice (And some people can't articulate the difference that well), but saying: