@MrGOH: actually they parted back in the first movie.

@Balmut: didn't she also ride a motor bike up the side of a building?

@Wolfbullet: the early Genisis games had it as well only not as much.

@The MSJ: you sure about that?

Yes Mila we know the movies are made dirt cheap so it's easy to turn a profit. That is not something to be proud of.

@TRT-X: rofl good call

@The Squid: but Scott Pilgram is a good adaptation. RE movies are not. They are a horrible adaptation.

@KrispyTheKorn: exactly they are decent pop corn action films but the fact they have RE in the title makes them worse as a true RE movie would be fantastic.

@LucasReis - LOCK2K: I know I would. Hell I would even go see it in theaters if it was called that.

@quadraphonic: oh yeah they are bad but at least he uses rotting corpses as zombies instead of people with some grey paint on their face.

@TRT-X: it's just like that scene in that one resident evil game where you throw a ninja star........

@pinshot: I agree with you on every point.

@thepenguin55: I disagree I think the second one is the only that feels like it fit. I don't think any of them are good but the second at least tried to follow the plot of the third game.

@nastastu: agreed peep show is good but it's to much of that weird british obsession with uncomfortable situations.

@IvanDashSmith: DO NOT THINK OF THE EVENT!

@Chewblaha: shame to since it isn't a hard series to make into a movie.

@Jimmy_Jazz: its the world premiere people get the tickets for free.

@Murderdolls: and psychic powers for no reason what so ever.

@Skutarth: one was crap as well. The entire series would be ok if it wasn't called Resident evil.

@buddhatooda: here's the thing. If the RE movies were just some random zomibe movies they would be fine.