Technically, it’s an annulus.
“There are a lot easier ways to kidnap someone than to use a toddler wandering down an interstate.” I would tend to agree, but can imagine criminal enterprises where the toddler is a disposable asset of limited value
In fairness, the Florida Department of Miseducation did not adopt the proposed standards detailing how Black people benefited from managed breeding and the injection of European traits into their bloodlines.
“By sending photos depicting sex acts to minors, Greene seems to have inadvertently violated revenge porn laws in her home state, as well as federal laws prohibiting the distribution of obscene material to minors.” I’m sure a huge swath of news outlets have sought comments from the relevant investigatory and…
“At that time, it was them saying they don’t know who the child might be, therefore they had no leads they could follow regarding the child versus saying the child didn’t exist.” While I think my point about credulously accepting police narratives is still worthwhile, your explanation of their statement certainly puts…
‘I hear you, but sometimes the police have to issue “disinformation”’ That’s a good point; sometimes the police are untrustworthy because they’re using their powers for good
‘I also wondered about them using “no reported missing child” as a way to cast doubt on what may have happened.’ The police do seem to have a habit of trying to discredit people with accounts they find inconvenient. The fact that Russell’s account seems to be falling apart under its own weight doesn’t stop that from…
And here I had thought statistics were invented largely because simply stringing a few anecdotes into a sweeping generalization is just so lazy looking
I’m kinda rooting for the weird guy with the box in the box to escape, assuming he does it nowhere near anywhere I am or may be at some future point in time.
I haven’t been deeply invested in this story, so I may certainly have received less mainstream "information", but I was told the the kid had been used as bait
In fairness, “not a legally persuasive argument” is the Supreme’s can’t avoid jam right now
While I doubt Russell’s account is true, I am troubled by the police implying that an abduction ring wouldn’t have access to a toddler that was either not reported as missing or included in a report with their mother, nor is it clear what criteria (in terms of recency or location) they used to claim there were no…
In the sense that the wife and children are also victims here, I can see a good case for centering them in some of the coverage.
One of the aspects of American history that I believe is poorly taught and understood (and likely to become more so due to their racialized nature) are the labor wars. I mean, when a shitty deal is a step up for that supply of people, how can they care or know to care?
Yet in the fallout of the ruling, one of its most backwards consequences has so far gone unnoticed: the primary beneficiaries of affirmative action will now be white men.
It’s kind of hard to notice in the write up, but the jury’s verdict was that Ms. Carroll did not provide sufficient evidence that Trump’s penis was inserted.
I’m not saying that FTB masturbated to her own congressional stunt props; I’m just going to be referring to her by an acronym that may or may not be “Flick The Bean” for the foreseeable future
“But I’m left wondering why the Gaetzes were even present on any Barbie red carpet” Given that a big portion of Matty’s “success” is driven by his family’s wealth and connections, it shouldn’t be surprising he had an in with some portion of the machinery there. As for why he’d want to go, it’s not like there weren’t…
One might consider the money, which is coming from large donations from outside of West Virginia, or the fact that Manchin is also co-chair of the national No Labels party.