In fairness, “don’t cause Texas water to be deported” could be considered a pro-water policy

Every one of those calls is a tragedy, doubly so when it includes reproductive coercion, and we already know what the GQP is doing is bad on so many levels.

I don’t understand how anyone computer literate enough to post a comment here could be genuinely confused by the fact that the construction popularized under Jim Crow would be deemed offensive, while the more modern phrasing is merely gaining momentum towards being considered ill-advised.

The doubling is a disturbing fact, although it very much should be noted it’s not calls that increased 99%, it’s ones with a reproductive coercion element that have. Of course, that’s an arbitrary and short-term comparison (in addition to narrowing out other call data), so it’s difficult to ascertain actual trends…

In so far as most Dems still aren’t willing to just kill the hostages the GQP is taking, I don’t think it matters much which ones voted to get this to the next step in the process.

I’m shocked no one has made an animated gif out of the picture above, where Crane’s head bobs with the caption “What is love?” yet.

A while back I heard some guy in the street screaming about how a time-traveling JFK shot himself in Dallas.

In fairness, you don’t hear Tub-’o-vile publicly endorsing an NCAA-inspired revamp of the GI Bill, turning all our troops into “student”-soldiers...

Exactly! I’m kind of relieved they’re putting clear markers down right away, so the contours of this new hellscape will be hard for those not paying attention to miss.

“Because... reasons.” That’s a big part of why I bristled at the “conservative rulings” explanation above; so much of their recent bullshit opinions and statements haven’t even been rooted in their putative methodology or ideology

‘Nothing about this dude screams “vaguely competent...”’ Fair, and we’re certainly seeing some strong indications lately that becoming a tech billionaire is hardly a strong endorsement

Yeah, and arguably there’d be egg on his face over that. At the same time, that’s a paltry $100,000 his campaign spent “trigging free-money libs” (or similar spin) which probably works out just as well for him.

Voter registration information is publicly available, so if Burgum’s campaign staff is even vaguely competent, it’ll take serious crimes to collect a comparably trivial payout

While your underlying point is correct, the notion of civilian leadership of our military is important enough to call out: We still have a president, regardless of Potato Town’s readiness disrupting fuckery

“Your white ancestors did something really bad, so you’re really bad.” Not that this excuses the actions of these miseducated racists, but there is something to be said for the idea that, because they support policies that perpetuate, rather than correct, these deep and reverberating injustices and injuries, they…

The word “separating” keeps appearing in this post, but it seems like this is really just an announcement that this married couple plans to openly and publicly also date other people.

Moms for Liberty: Americans don’t know or understand basic concepts about recent murderous dictators.

Which pivots so nicely into his campaign slogan:

In fairness, the gaffe is distracting from the GQP’s abysmal record on actual freedoms.

In fairness, where could Lindsey possibly find some homoerotic undertones for his triumphant comeback campaign ad?