They want Bernie. They’re not exactly subtle about it, either.

Although to be clear I would *not* advocate the removal of RvW or Griswold since I value stare decisis and generally don’t support tearing down prior landmark decisions unless they are Dred Scott level bad.

It’s almost like the young bloggers of SplinterKidzNewz didn’t learn about the French Revolution, or maybe they’re not in 9th grade yet.  The good news about that though at the end of it, a bunch of ‘radical’ leftists ended up separated from their heads via the very same mechanism they put in place for ‘change’

I think we have a beef with almost anyone here because there’s a lack of courage. It seems like we’re all radical because we deeply care about the people we represent and we want to throw down for them

I’m shocked that they let one truthful statement out of the greys....

Why “weirdly”? She’s a right wing nutter and knows that Sanders will be drawing votes away from the Democratic nominee again like he did to Hillary (which is why he ran then and is running now).

Ohh the excuses for his inevitable loss are starting early.

You know who got pummeled by moderates last time? Bernie Sanders. Also, the vast majority of sanders backed campaigns faltered in 2018.

But hey, go full socialist for flyover country in 2020 and then enjoy your 4 more years with Trump.   Drink that kool-aid!

Ahh Splinter. Damn what can actually pass, we want EVERYTHING RIGHT NOW REGARDLESS OF POLITICAL REALITY!!!!!1!!

‘single-handedly upended the election’?  Holy fuck what the fuck are you talking about?  

That’s funny. In my tribe we call black people to be ‘Just rednecks with a tan’

You wanted to believe him because you hate white people 

Jussie,Jussie,Jussie ! The fuck you doing man ?!

Why SHOULD he declare?  He’s floating a wave of attention and speculation without actually having to file the paperwork. The smart ones wait as long as they can if they are already garnering tons of free media. 

Because the deal is trash.

What is the thing in that picture?

Yes, don’t do what the people want, do what the child bloggers from Gizmodo group know is best for everyone.

The original title of the article was ether going to be “Well Actually, That Popular Thing Is Bad” or “I’m Better Than You: Why You Should Be Ashamed Of Yourself”

No it isn’t. Your stance is “x is unecessary, x costs innocent lives, therefore x should not be allowed.”

The fact that when x=handguns you are for it, but when x=alcohol you are against it states either that your argument is fundamentally flawed, or you are a gaping hypocrite. Especially since alcohol is far more…

It is actually a pretty valid equivalency. How many minors die from drinking and driving because parents had alcohol in the house? The answer is a shit load.