lightshear
Adam Withers
lightshear

He's not saying you're buying the product. He's saying the return on your investment is the chance to own something that wouldn't exist if you didn't invest in the company. Emphasis added because there's no guarantee, just like there's never a guarantee on return for an investment - companies go belly-up, ideas flop,

Alaska: 64.7

The QfG series is what got me into role-playing in general and changed everything about how I thought of video games. I didn't get into the series until the remake of QfG1 with the mouse interface, so I missed the typing, but when I found out it was part of a series I went out and got 2 & 3. While I love them all

That's… not a terrible setup, you know? It's the game's one idea, insofar as it seems like an idea that someone actually had, and not a thing someone saw in another game and decided to copy. It's wasted, of course, but it is at the very least a moderately novel setup in our current video-game age of zombie

I understand the desire to take full credit for something new you've uncovered. But still: I found Williams' reasoning a tad...puzzling. What's the point of revealing a new ability to a game's community if you know they won't take kindly to it—so much so that it will most likely never end up being used?

Boy, the militarization of the police just don't quit, huh?

I felt this every time people talked about Destiny. They would complain about this laundry list of problems and shortcomings, but then insist "Oh, no, but it's so much fun to play!" I always felt like it sounded like a waste of time to endure all those flaws just because the shooting was fun. It seemed more like an

Here's a weird thing - I outgrew MK, then regrew right back into it. I walked away from the silly-stupid levels of violence back in high school, finding it gratuitous and mind-numbing, and preffering the gameplay of faster, slicker fighters. MK felt slow, sluggish, and juvinile, and I didn't have the time or quarters

Call me an old man who's behind the times, but I will always prefer original Flynn, Tron and Sark to the sulking son and sultry warrior woman from the latest attempt at resurrecting the 1982 Disney classic. Alas, it's Sam Flynn and Quorra making their debut this evening in the iOS version of Disney Infinity 2.0, with

Certainly a fair assumption. As with most revolutions, innocents are frequently hurt along with the guilty. #NotAllTribalLords and all that. Though it should be said that his war methodology was the same as that practiced by all militaries of the time. So, really, the regimes he overtook were likely every bit as

Most were. That was the entire driving force behind his rise to power; these tribal lords were brutal savages. Khan himself was thrown into the wilderness as a child, his family left to die. He rose from nothing to become a champion of the people against the brutalization they had endured, and they loved him for it.

No. But you have to look at the actions of people in the context of the period of time they lived in. If somebody today (as happens, unfortunately) won their rulership through raping and pillaging a country, we'd call them nightmarish villains. In Khan's day, we'd call it normal. To say that he should have built an

...And those aristocrats he killed were systematically brutalizing their people. That's why he rose up and became a leader. He was fighting to free the people from tyrannical rule of vicious, evil men. They weren't put to death for being wealthy, it was the casual cruelty they inflicted and the misery of the people

I don't think the suggestion is that he's an upstanding citizen. But you also have to take into account the era and the people of the day. If Genghis Kahn led a campaign of rape and pillage to unite an empire, the same could be said of every leader of that time. He was just more successful. The way armies were fed and

*siiiiigh* All I'm saying is that he's more complicated than people credit him with. He brought as much peace and civility as he did death, which could be said of Alexander the Great, Charlemagne, Ceasar, or even a lot of early American presidents. If American history was written primarily by black slaves and Native

Wow. Nice false equivalency you've got there. You sure proved me wrong by sarcastically misrepresenting my position.

Genghis Khan was also responsible for taking regions who were at constant war and uniting them under a banner of tolerance. He targeted the wealthy and powerful, championing the people, and fought a revolution that created Mongolia. Under his rule, there was religious tolerance, significantly broader racial tolerance,

Oh, look! She found her special porpoise.

Thank you for your optimism. I thought the trailer looked fine, resembling the Ultimate Fantastic Four comics more than anything, and it reminded me of the way the FF were designed to be in the beginning.

The 1990s were a decade where new characters, gadgets and villains showed up in rapid succession to the Bat-books and something about Breyfogle's art synced so well with the era it was appearing in. His sleek angular linework joined up with an intuitive sense of when to detail something out and when drench it in