That’s a lot of words to say “I’m a little whiny bitch who can’t actually analyze soccer.”

I’d been waiting for this article all fucking season. Billy Frontrunner literally can’t help himself.

Another article like this. How quaint. It’s getting boring. It’s kind of like the “Harry Kane is a one season wonder” articles. They got boring, and people kept writing them because it’s easy. Easy is lazy. You’re lazy. Then again, it’s my fault for clicking on the link and coming to a website like this, that knows…

Kane scored more goals than Agüero in 2015-16, 2016-17, and for the first two months of this year, and they have comparable assists. Man U’s defense couldn’t even stop Huddersfield.

Tottenham play some of the most stylish, inventive soccer around, can stand toe-to-toe with literally every single club in the league on the pitch without batting an eye, can and do wreck the much more expensively assembled squads of their supposed betters, as they demonstrated in yesterday’s demolishing of…

Fan holding the toddler and trying to get in on the action is an early frontrunner for Father of the Year.

baffling lineup? It’s Europa League and they were cruising, no need to send the first team to bust their asses in Belgrade

“Save” is a bit rich, don’t you think? They were top of the group regardless of this result and playing a team of substitutes.

Pitch: “It’s like Regus, but trendy!”

Particularly people who have recently been incarcerated and are facing a long period of time, maybe a life sentence, that’s an extraordinary stressor,”

Latinx (n): the type of shit that keeps costing us elections.

Gender-neutral terminology is great when the gender of the subject(s) is unknown/unclear or a group consisting of multiple genders.

No. You’re talking about individuals. Even if you think you’re being “broadly inclusive,” you’re still referring to two specific dudes.

You mean a pair of LATINO men


“Latin-x” isn’t a word in the Spanish language - it was made up by anglophone leftists

“Latinx” men = Latino.

Eastern MA resident:

We used to look to military leaders to have proven their ability to lead. From Washington to Eisenhower. Then we looked at career politicians for a long time. Now people are starting to look at CEOs, since many corporations have the size and scope of a small military.

While I generally agree with your premise, I disagree with your insinuation that Trump as CEO is at all comparable to an ACTUAL CEO. Sure, that is the premise that he rode into the presidency on (Successful businessman can successfully run country), but CEO of a major company like Disney is not at all the same as…

Of course.

I hear you, but the alternative to politics-as-usual shouldn’t be enshrining corporate practices, which have also, to borrow your phrase, been “fucking over the citizens of this country without lube” since time began.