You’re far and away the worst and most vapid writer on the sites.

When people tell me I am wasting my time playing video games at the age of 44, I point to this “sport” and tell them, no, watching THAT is a waste of time.

What should he have said - in your mind, I’m curious to know what the perfect statement would be?

Yes but what about people who didn’t know Weinstein but were acquainted with the Weinstein-affiliated artists who should have known about Weinstein’s behavior and yet did nothing to call them out on their complacency. We can make some articles about that.

I’m going to pile on because you deserve this. Who knows, it may come out that LCK did indeed do some unforgivable shit. Problem is, there is zero credible information behind this and you look like just the latest GMG asshole trying to turn this into a thing. If a credible source ever emerges, I’ll be the first with a…

Stop being such scumbags about this Louis CK thing. You guys made up a story. It didn’t pan out. When your BS has been debunked by everyone else including the people you attributed as sources (Jen Kirkman), it’s time to move on. This site has continued to be scumbags about this rumor by doubling down trump style. No…

I will not shed a tear if they get sued out of existence because of this. The Kirkman rumor was an unsubstantiated one started by gawker and perpetuated by its successors. When the sources you attributed to are distancing themselves to it, maybe it’s time to drop it.

My mileage didn’t vary, it was weak as shit.

Chalk me up as another one who feels you need to stop pushing that.

Martin does love his Chinese tattoos though

Jesus Christ you’re a fucking moron.

That 16.8T number he uses is NET WORTH. Net worth includes all of your illiuid assets.

No, my guess is that many of the rich will simply leave to another Western democracy, take their money with them, and watch while the US implodes. If you want to fight over the scraps, I doubt they’ll mind and, if anything, will probably enjoy watching it.

...which puts the money right back in the hands of the folks it was taken from. In effect, proving the theory totally effective.

It’s their money because neither you nor the government can get it without following lawful process.

HNWI is ‘investible assets’, not liquid assets. HamLoaf’s ‘i.e.’ in the second paragraph is flat wrong. This is a valuation of all assets that are investible, which includes corporate stocks and 2nd homes. These aren’t liquid, especially in a situation where the affluent have just suffered such a major setback.

Not only that, but they’d likely pull any funds they had invested and crash the market and likely spark a bank run that would be worse than 1929. This plan would incite anarchy and would probably not result in a single penny being “redistributed” to anyone.

This is satire, right? I refuse to believe that an adult can be this retarded.

This is beyond ridiculous on a million different levels. First: who in Congress would vote for this? Everyone in Congress is worth millions. Second: even if you had a Congress willing to vote on this, how would you prevent people from moving their (by your own definition, liquid) wealth out of the country before it…

Senior writer or senior dumbass?