LOL what’s one thing a car person has NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER EVER said when buying an enthusiast car, I’ll take the CVT please.

These are being bought by people who expect them to take off in value, which maybe.  But I highly doubt it with no stick, not even a freaking DCT but a shit box CVT.  Dealers are gonna ask a premium because limited, but I would bet they don’t hold their value over time.

Wake up sheeple this red water aka Commie Water, is just a plot by the libs, working with Russia and North Korea where they mix di-hydrogen monoxide with the same forever chemicals that turned the frogs gay. It’s all a massive plot to infect you with the homo which results in an uncontrollable desire to shove things…

And that’s what happens when you more or less reverse engineer a Ferrari 458 (IIRC), build it yourself and don’t add the Ferrari tax.

Because it’s a limited production run, that’s the only reason why.

Oh forgot minivans lol. Yeah not a ton of options, for the money I would think either a Transit for Econoline would be best.

The larger more broad auto show style is dead, in favor of more specialized smaller events. These days an auto maker can get more eyes in their new concept/model by partnering with automotive YouTubers and press outlets.

I was about to say the biggest issue with their needs in climate controlled storage, so it’s either a van or suv as the only real options

That’s kind of the thing, something like carbon credits aren’t reducing pollution it’s a zero sum game, business A pollutes less to business B can pollute more

Disagree, adding chargers is a value add for the developer/builder, and frankly the cost versus the construction cost of a house or commercial building is negligible and look I work in real estate, the amount of profit a builder makes is wild many times is a 25% or more profit margin and that’s just one a residential…

Right or even just refit like a Transit or something

Yes but again company B is just doing what it was already doing whether there were carbon credits or not. It’s not like Tesla is making an EV instead of an ICE car, they are doing it anyway, but Company pays them money for credits so that company A looks better on paper. Now I know at some point, I think, there were…

Yes but then it wouldn’t be a HALO car lol. Honestly I don’t know maybe there was packaging/cost issues trying to put in something else but it’s a shame they didn’t continue on with it it has such a lovely sound.

“Those would require a cab over or semi cab over design where the drivers have to climb up more to get into the vehicle.”

I mean to be fair for a Lexus, who at that point and still, hadn’t done a truly halo sports car. Plus it had extensive use of carbon fiber a first for Lexus/Toyota at the time, that said it’s mostly the glorious engine lol

I mean they are 100% better from the drivers perspective, I have heard horror stories from mail carrier that used to stop at the gas station I worked at. But they could have gone for a stubby nose design similar to the old Econoline vans of the 90's and the proportions would have looked better. I mean I agree it is…

Well that and these pooling agreements, and things like carbon credits are/were a big scam anyway. So company A pays company B money so that company A can pollute like they already are, but it’s not like company B was like you know we got all the coal we were gonna burn but you paid us money so we won’t burn it, like…

I hate it, mainly because the proportions are just so off, I mean I know the current ones are a soda can with wheel, but ooff

Wait is that delivering my mail now lol

Yeah and it’s one ugly SOB, like could no one, not one single freaking person, step and and say hey, yeah that design is absolute shit. It’s just so ungainly, like they were designing the front to be like a small van or something, got to the rear of the hood and someone said you know what make it 12' from that point…