Or perhaps this is nothing more than the result of confirmation bias. The first few times that this happened were likely nothing more than a statistical fluke, but because you now assume that people who accept the water will succeed, your demeanor towards those who accept is likely more positive than it is to those…

It's not lying, but it's deceptive. People expect and deserve to be evaluated fairly—not with little tricks and gimmicks.

Antitrust is just America's confusing name for the broader field of fair competition law. This sort of thing is exactly what DOJ's antitrust division deals with.

How about you actually address the arguments presented to you instead of calling them nonsense and then announcing your plans to prove people wrong at some unspecified future date?

You just lost all credibility by insinuating that the core tenets of antitrust law are nonsense. Thanks for playing.

Such competition is unsustainable. It will result in a format war, which will invariably leave but one company standing (guess who Nvidia wants it to be?) The winner will have monopoly control and will be able to freeze out all future competition—the cost of entering the market will be the cost of bribing every…

No, it's called an anti-competitive business practice, and it results in a marketplace that is WORSE for consumers. You really want NVidia to gain monopoly control so that they can charge you more for an inferior product simply because they can pay off developers? How is that good for anyone except NVidia? You're…

The opponent's product is only being made worse because Nvidia is BRIBING developers not to do business with them. Under such a system, NVidia could make an objectively inferior graphics card, charge more for it, and still retain market share simply because they have enough capital to bribe developers into not…

Except they're not making a better product. That's the entire issue. They're competing not on their ability to make the best graphics card but on their ability to bribe developers. Essentially, they're trying to pay people to purposefully and artificially cripple games run on a competitor's product.

This isn't capitalism. It's market manipulation.

They're not making a better product though. They're simply bribing developers to create games that will not work as well (or even at all) on a competitor's product. They're not competing on the quality of their graphics card, they're competing with payola. This won't do anything to encourage better games or…

Look up moral nihilism. Its indistinguishable from your "liberating" philosophy.

Thank you for the lesson in moral nihilism, Machiavelli

Too bad spritz has been shown to reduce people's reading comprehension down to near zero.

Don't going offing those pure maidens just yet. The same company also licensed Sailor Moon Crystal for US release.

Here's a better tip, if you hear someone using the word "so" a lot, don't assume they lack credibility. Judging people based on insubstantial behaviors like this is absurd.