Step back, because this take is blisteringly hot!

No, we should approach them only as an art form, not as some sort of historical truth.

Sure I am. And a 26-year-old powerlifter. And I fight MMA on the weekends, and make $8,000.00 a month working from home being a personal shopper.

"When a film maker mangles the historical record shouldn't we question what the film maker is trying to accomplish by that act?"

There has never been any single historical or biographical movie ever made, including documentaries, that didn't in some way distort the actual historical record. Fahrenheit 9/11 did. Glory did. The Hurricane did. Elizabeth did. Lincoln did. Zero Dark Thirty did. And American Sniper did.

Joss Whedon - fighting the good fight for fictional gender equality.

I heard he's a Pomeranian.

American Sniper was a movie critics loved, until Middle Anerica liked it, then it became racist. Michael Moore said something stupid and insulting for publicity. Seth Rogen made a dumb joke that was unfortunately timed the same as Moore's. Any controversy about the film is mostly on the Internet and spearheaded by…

Drunk, fat, and stupid is no way to go through life Ms. Grace.

What's dumber? The opinions of some steakhouse owner, or people who comment about the opinions of some steakhouse owner?

If you can't be really funny, at least send the moms home happy.

If this movie succeeds financially, it'll because moms came out to see it.

Current cast ≠ Actually funny

"Well, let's say Allison Williams represents the normal amount of psychokinetic energy in the New York area. Based on this morning's sample, it would be Lena Dunham ….. five feet long, weighing approximately six hundred pounds."

Sandra Bullock should have been a shoo-in. Love her or hate her, she's the biggest female comedy star by a long mile.

Is it just me, or did The Interview remind anyone else of Triumph of the Will?

My guess (and it is only a guess) is that Jay was wayyyyy more involved than he let on to the police. As in he knew what Adnan was planning and helped him out by trying to set up his alibi. That would make him an accessory before the fact, not after.

Same question. Why the hell would they keep that a secret? Who would admit to being an accessory to murder, or stay quiet for fifteen years, because they're afraid to admit to stealing a car?

What king of kingpin is this that he's killing and burying an innocent girl in an unmarked grave and fifteen years later maintains the power to get people to take life prison sentences for him? We're getting to Joker levels of super villainy here.

He stole the car at the same time he's borrowing Adnan's car? While she is abducted by an unknown third party and murdered? Then claims Adnan did it and he's an accessory after the fact for murder rather than just a car thief?