lewis55number2
lewis55number2
lewis55number2

This is so painful. Klobuchar is about as close an ally in Congress as President Sanders would ever be able to hope to have. And yet his supporters are willing to vote against her. To accomplish what exactly?? Have another right wing republican senator who will oppose everything Bernie supports even more strongly?

How’s his political revolution going to work out if he doesn’t bother to try to elect Democratic congress people??

And what is wrong with members of congress being more loyal to the presidential candidate who actually looks out for them and tries to help them? We need to elect a democratic congress to get anything done. HRC is helping make that happen by raising money for down ballot candidates. Sanders is not. Its completely

THANK YOU. Such an idiotic faux outrage. She’s raising all this money for dozens and dozens of down ballot races. Individual donors face very low caps on how much they can give to her. Nobody is giving her $300,000 here.

Touche! Can’t believe i forgot that one...

A. He signed Marvin as a cheap mid-level free agent. The Hawks drafted Marvin Williams. If you want to go after him for a bad draft pick, the example you’re looking for is Adam Morrison, not Marvin Williams. (Marvin Williams is actually playing well this year relative to his contract on that mid-level free agent deal

Its not about dissuading Trump supporters and very little of the rhetoric you see against Trump in the coming months will be about turning his current supporters off of him. Trump’s current support is still quite limited, its not a majority of the Republican party, let alone anything close to a majority of the general

Thank you.

So if you didn’t think it was boring, and nobody else seems to have thought it was boring, why open by saying some people might have thought it was boring? It was a really fun game.

Yes, exactly my point. The score doesn’t indicate on its own whether its an interesting game. Spurs-GSW is interesting whether its slow or fast paced. That’s why its lazy, bad writing to say “oh its boring look at this slug fest”.

“ Those who switched over from college basketball hoping for a more exciting game probably would have had more fun sticking with March Madness, since the Spurs made the game an ugly, slow, physical wrestling match.”

More importantly, you follow Charlie V on twitter?

+1

Warren’s radio silence at this point is tantamount to a tacit endorsement of Hillary. She doesn’t want to disappoint her fervent followers and damage her own credibility with them by openly endorsing Hillary when Bernie still has a heartbeat because she hopes to draw on those fervent followers (the clear majority of

This is an unweighted raw average, so a discrepancy that small means nothing. Given that there are more women than men overall on her staff, there could easily be more women than men among the lower ranks / entry level positions , pulling down the average slightly.

he may sound like a nobody to most of you, but he is considered one of the biggest rising stars in college coaching, with a lead job at a D1 (until this at least) supposedly coming up in his near future. whoops.

To be fair, while he blows, he’s clearly better than Peyton was last year and they won a super bowl. Defense won’t be as good next year, but its not preposterous.

Well to be fair... Crawford doesn’t bait people into saying something bad and then give them a T for saying something bad. He just gives out Ts for no apparent reason, like Tim Duncan laughing. He doesn’t even need the pretense of baiting people to do it. Its a whole other level of bad.

Sheesh. You’re the one being disingenuous. Hadriano was not arguing that he was expelled based on rumors. He was presumably expelled based on very concrete evidence. No one disputes that. Hadriano is arguing that it is currently a rumor what it was that he was expelled about. That is, we don’t currently know why he

So you’re digging in on a report from last year that couldn’t possibly pertain to this person? If it really is dated “2015" then there’s a 0% chance the incident it records could possibly refer to this specific person, right? As that would mean he would have been expelled last spring and thus couldn’t have been on the