lewa358
Lewa358
lewa358

Thing is, I can’t see an issue that would cause one state to secede that the other state wouldn’t be in favor of. 

Maybe if the wall itself is notable in some way, like with an art print or painted design on it? Or if the monitor is extended from the wall somehow (as with a mount)?

They come in various sizes, if the ones I saw at best buy are any indication. 

I can unfortunately confirm that they are good at appealing to a larger audience that are a bit too dumb for the usual Star Trek stuff.

This is because I, myself, am a bit too dumb for the usual Star Trek stuff, and I like the movies.

When episode 9 came out, I based my entire decision on whether I would see the film on whether Kylo gets redeemed.

I’m not sure why it would have been “pointless”?

The road to success—and especially toward reforming an intergalactic empire into a functioning democracy—is hardly going to be straightforward. Having Kylo be the bad guy would emphasize just how maliciously, unquestionably evil the Empire/Sith really are, and having

I’m not sure why people like you can’t fathom the idea that “heroes” might be actual characters with flaws and regrets.

Y’know, the kind of things that make characters and stories interesting and not just vapid, aimless fanservice.

If you had it your way, Luke’s appearance in the sequel trilogy would be just as bland

When you’re spending tens of millions of dollars to have hundreds of people put their hearts and souls into a project...I’m sorry, Zaslav, but you’re committed. You have an implicit obligation to see it through to the end in some capacity.

I pretty strongly disagree with the idea that “enjoying” the game and “winning” the game are somehow contradictory. When I play a game, even a challenging one, I’m by definition having fun and enjoying it.

The idea with this one is to appeal to the casual Wii-loving audience that Nintendo no longer caters to.

SBMM is the only way competitive online games can work.

The bots would need to be for the high tier players, as those are the smaller group.

See, normally I’d agree, but...well, Ant-Man brought up the Quantum Realm in its first film. Doctor Strange ended with him defeating Dormammu. Diving into the biggest “idea” of the series is something the MCU consistently does right off the bat.

Not for the last decade, really.

When’s the last time we’ve seen a summer blockbuster get a tie-in video game of the same name? Like, Thor 2?

Hey, if “Hawkeye” can refer to two concurrently active people, why not “Spider-Man”?

Miles is 100% a Spider-Man. Remember, the coda of the first film is “Anyone can wear the mask”—and Across went further with the idea by asserting that Miles can be Spider-Man even if he’s “not supposed to.”

She can’t really use that name in-universe, though. Kinda ruins the whole secret identity thing.

With an IP as crucial to WB’s branding and John Cena as a major lead...this one unfortunately would need marketing. It would harm WB’s “brand” to release a Looney Toons film without aggressive confidence in it...
...because that might make the IP worth less when Zaslav sells it.

I’ve been plugging various phones into a USB-C docks for years now and so far it’s never, ever transmitted video. Best I could get is audio output or kb/m input.

That’s literally the point. WB is no longer interested in TV movies, or direct-to-video, or direct-to-streaming. It’s theatrical or nothing.
Somehow this means that in-development films have to either be converted to theatrical films (a la Blue Beetle), or get thrown in the trash.

The problem, I think, is that