Watched the video, it says nothing about if they actually tried to register for the race or anything of that sort. Nothing about passing inspection, etc.

He said they bought it to “chase” the Baja, meaning scoot around the desert to follow the action and drink beer. No serious racing intended

For sale: 1 full set, King remote reservoir shocks. There is already a car installed on them, I’ll throw it in with the purchase.

The last time our two countries tried to introduce democracy to Korea, it destroyed 90% of North Korea and killed 2.5 million people, including about 10% of the NK population. And more bombs were dropped than in the entire Pacific theatre of WWII. And it only half worked. So, you know, it’s probably not an…

Oh jeez. The fact that there’s active debate here about the very question proves that this is a non-story. It’s a spicy question, for sure. Personally I would click “no”. But that’s not good enough for some people, they think the question shouldn’t even exist! How dare anyone even consider the thought? Who cares that…

Why does this article exist?

Nukes were not the main cause of the Japan’s surrender. That was just the narrative the US pushed out afterwards to justify the use of the bombs and an attempt to try and scare our allies in case they had plans of turning on each other. The British were so afraid of Russia forcibly extending their boarders, that they…

It is the same kind of math. Except instead of solving for minimum profit loss, you’re solving for ‘maximum happiness,’ whatever that happens to mean to you. Sometimes there are no good answers, and going through it like this helps you find the ‘least worst’ answer.

Justin, please stick to cars and car like things.

Maybe he was saying that he was just a decent fellow.

This is a variation of the trolley dilemma. It is a classic philosophical thought experiment. I only know this because it was on the Good Place recently.

This sounds like the math from Fight Club automotive recall.

I think this is a fine question. I think its great that people are actually talking about the cost of doing something vs nothing. Its good for people to understand what it really takes to ‘fix’ the NK problem. I bet he and his friend were just talking about these kinds of things, and wondered how others felt. I don’t…

well yeah if you want to be technical... his question though implied a moral dilemma, would it be acceptable to sacrifice a ‘few’ for the good of the ‘many’

What percentage of the North Korean population has already died at the hands of and due to the rule of the Kim Dynasty?

People really need to discuss what is acceptable in regards to war, death and politicians ambitions. What do you propose Mr. Westbrook? , simply ignoring the fact that there are times that war=consequences?

What if leaving them isolated also means millions will die prematurely due to issues from living there such as poor living conditions, medicine and nutrition?

I don’t know.... maybe ask Japan after WWII.... it did stop the war but it killed tens of thousands of people...

...and this is of interest why? He posited a moral dilemma on twitter and gets shit for merely daring to ask the question? Man people have become so f’in sensitive lately!!

I mean.... it’s a valid question.