Whereas we should take your word as a neon flashing bigot, illuminating the night with your ignorance and racism. Say, you don't have an opinion on Israel do you? I bet it's not extreme or insane sounding either. So, tell us YOUR enlightened world view, BigFloppyDonkeyDong. Does it involve, I dunno, white people?

Fuck you, sir or madam.

That's not anecdotal evidence. That's a baseless (also stupid) allegation. Anecdotal evidence would be a couple examples. Hard evidence would be enough examples to establish a pattern.

I think what you just said is undeniable. There would have been no joking. There would have been condemnation of the man, and rightfully so, and how society at large condones his behavior.

I agree. Reading this article, until the very end I could picture the author shaking her head and chuckling, like "What? Girl, you're pretty loopy LOL." Then at the end there was a brief lecture on communicating with one's SO over sexual dissatisfaction, and no mention of how horrific this act was until the very last…

Yeah…… I know Jez is meant to be less serious than a news site, and I'm not usually part of the WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ crowd, but I think there's no denying this article would have had a completely different tone if a man had shot a woman over sex. Can we not do that anymore?

Read his posting history. Words like cunt and faggot are part of his lexicon. He also advocates beating women up. Lost cause with that one.

I love how someone else's outfit can ruin EVERYONE'S family fun.

Oh... Yay. MORE mansplaining.

She should wear this one to the pool next time and see how fast it takes to get tossed out.

Yes, because God forbid children ever see the human body. Why do you view harassing women about swimsuits as the best way to preserve decency in this world?

To me the saddest misogyny she faces is the misogyny from women who consider themselves 'liberal' or 'feminist'. I'm not talking about the ones who can't stand her because of her whiny, spoiled, dishonest, vapid nature- that's valid. I'm talking about the ones who are so bothered by her sexual choices and her…

if they really were concerned about anonymity, blurring their faces would have made more sense.

You know, I thought that too, but if that were the case wouldn't it have been the editor's first line of defense? He didn't say it, which makes me think they didn't seriously consider including faces.

No problem! I think this could also easily be another instance of bandwagon hate against Kim because Lord knows a lot of people love to do that. BUT Kim does face a LOT of misogynist comments from people, so who really knows.

This is probably a stretch, but do you think there maybe a hint of misogyny in this? Everyone has already pointed out that this guy is on Entourage (which I've never watched btw) and he takes pics of himself glorifying his opulence. So how come it's okay for him to praise wealth but it's not okay for Kim to brag about…

Grenier isn't that critical of the unfiltered, glorified opulence on his show though.