I know! It's sick that something like that even exists. How inhumane do you have to be to 1. rape a 5-year-old (or anyone else for that matter), 2. Take a picture of that kind of abuse and circulate it for profit, and 3.) enjoy looking at something like that? It makes you feel so bad for whoever that poor victim was.…

“...If Channing Tatum, (for example) poses nude he knows full well that women will be looking at him not as a person but as a sexual object. Nobody is looking at those well-oiled rock hard abs and thinking, ‘boy I wonder what his take on the Iran nuclear deal is?’ He is an active participant in said objectification.”

You’re partially wrong about objectification. To objectify someone is to lower them in value from the status of a person to the status of a thing. A thing has no rights, no agency, no wishes or beliefs. I can see someone in a sexual way and express fantasies about him or her all I want. But until I lower him or her to…

Exactly. How about not wasting your time on cheating douchebags you feel you have to babysit.

If he'll cheat on you with the help, he'll cheat on you with other women as well.

That doesn’t seem like a contradiction. She’s not denying her past, and she’s telling her story but she’s rejecting the slurs and misogyny people throw at her for it. I don’t see how that’s any different from a hypothetical gay man going, “I’m not a f*g but I did all these guys and got nicknamed "cocksucker" but I'm…

Because a woman can only be empowered if she has never, ever , ever made a bad decision, gotten with a douchebag, or had moments of insecurity? I think you're confusing empowerment with an idealized perfect woman who has never shown bad judgment before.

She didn't name the husband she was talking about, and she said it was not only because of his size, but because the sex overall was bad. So I'm not bothered by it.

Equating white supremacy with someone choosing to be sexually immodest (be it in a movie role, a music video, a photoshoot, or in their personal life) is such an obvious false equivalent. So is the comparison between the sexually immodest person and Hitler. And you obviously don't know what the word objectify means,…

The question is did he know that they were under 18 at the time? Isn’t the general assumption that everyone on an online dating site is an adult?

It’s nice to see another person/feminist/celebrity who understands that nudity/’immodesty’ and open sexuality don’t automatically mean a woman is desperately trying to please men, and that experimenting with being deliberately 'immodest' and 'not ladylike' can be freeing and rebellious for some.

The funny thing about 'feminists' who defend being problematic and don't care about changing it is that they have the nerve to criticize others when they say/do something problematic. If that's the kind of person you want to be, fine, you have the constitutional right to be that just like any republican. It's just…

I’m not even a nanny, but I’m 23 and still offended by the notion that

I starred your comment because I don't find what you jokingly said any more or less ridiculous than the article's sentiment of telling women not to hire attractive women or women in their 20's in order to keep one's husband from having an affair.

I agree. Now if only she could be as tolerant of others.

Even so, it’s not like escorts are the people who invented the idea that women with her body type should be shamed. And there are plenty of women who don’t have her body type or her career ambitions that are totally on her side on the body issue.

Why can't she be proud of what she does without putting down other women for their bodies and their choices? I'm all for celebrating women who break any sort of mold, but it doesn't have to be done with any type of "I'm better than those pretty little whores" rhetoric. Other than that, I'm on her side.

How dare anyone ever be bothered by words said about groups of people! She has the right to elevate herself over other women based on her body and what she does for a living without anybody criticizing her for it. Damn libruls! Damn feminazis! /sarcasm

I’m going to tell you what I told another commenter here: You’re right, but people aren't getting it.

You sound like quite the conservative, whining about how political correctness is inconveniencing you. Yes, you don't have to approve of everyone's life choices, and no feminism doesn't mean it's wrong to 'hurt someone's feelings', but the minute you try to act like you're above others because of what you do with your…