And as an O’s fan, we've already traded our young talent for aging pitchers trying to match their ERA to their pant size.

I’m sure the show has a couple unpaid interns who’s whole job is to give him a dossier on the next couple of marks, excuse me, guests

Former coverage on this site indicated its pretty rare language for a first round pick, and unheard of for the top five.

Former coverage on this site, and ESPN?

That’s a false equivalency. Airfares are computed using shared costs. You are taking that shirt home yourself.

They currently use the system you are describing - but as a function of volume, rather than weight. I am a 6'1 female, and 270 lbs. However, I’m a former semi-pro athlete, and I fit comfortably in the seat. My sister is 5'11 and 260 lbs, and has never done a pushup. When we travel together, she pays for two seats…

Charging on a passenger’s weight would be skirting it REALLLY close to discrimination - and the airlines streamline their luggage charging fees because saying they charge for luggage based on weight is one thing - but arguing with every angry dad who weighed all his kid’s luggage at home is another.

Teo is actually…

From what I understand, all the broadcasters (NBC, CBC, BBC) get the same feed. But it then up to them what they do with it, and when. I think the annoyance is that NBC chose to cut away from the live feed to show something 10 hours old, that had no bearing on the outcome of that event, in an attempt to make a tenser…

....does anyone care about that, other than those of us that already have to read irb updates every year? I wasn't trying to teach him the Catch rule, or advantage. I was answering his question

For reference! Also illegal.

Always illegal - if you drive them to the ground, and their feet leave the ground (like a hard tackle in football), its legal. Anytime that your motion is upwards, and it causes them to lose their feet before driving them, that’s going to be illegal.

It's actually pretty common when it's a prosecutor on a fact finding mission. However, if this was part of a civil case, absolutely, all parties should have attorneys there.

There is also precedent across the country (I don’t know about the state this suit would be in) that if an organization holds itself out to credential people as “safe,” they are assuming the burden of actually ensuring they are “safe”.

I don’t understand why this is news? This is a standard filing that happens in every single death penalty case - this one isn’t even presenting a unique or different argument, it seems to be a standard brief modified slightly to fit federal law in that circuit.

What the hell are you saying?

Oh, it would be an home away from home game all 8 games. No one who lives in that town has the money to spend on a ticket. And when they said “football”, all the locals heard “futbol”

....how does that change the story?

We didn't have state income tax when I lived there - pretty much everything was funded (and well!) by the entertainment tax - I think it's 25% - that the casinos and cathouses pay off the top. I can't see them agreeing to a rate hike to keep a competition from having to shell out more money.

I read this while waiting for my next page to load, and had to come back to star this.

Every time I see Tina Fey as Sarah Palin, I have to double check which one it is.