I think you get 50 cents for your ride in the whaaaambulance. .

Too long to read. -1

I have no problem with Deen getting dumped since it was a private business that I believe made the right call. It just seems like many people on liberal sights are more than willing to be angry with Baldwin, but not quite angry enough to say fire him. Why? Because they really, really like him. As for chik-Fil-a, the…

But when you get to work, and a black guy pisses you off, will you call them a nigger. No, you won't.

So I'm sure you think it's appropriate for NBC to dump him like the networks dumped Paula Deen, right?

More context:

Yeah, Baldwin's story about "queen" not being homophobic might work if not for the fact that he also tweeted he would stick his foot up the guy's ass but he'd probably dig it. Anyone out there who tries to defend this nonsense is basically admitting that they like 30-rock too more than they hate homophobia.

It's also important to note that this is their best shot. Once the pros start testifying about ballistics and injuries, the cops and others who have testified before, it's more difficult to trip them up.

It's the job of his attorney to make her look bad. It's what he's being paid to do. A guy's freedom hangs in the balance. Guilty or not, his lawyer is what stands in the way and to not make her look bad would mean he's not doing his job. I've had to defend some bad, really bad, people. I've had to ask people who are…

My takeaway from this? Highly unlikely any towing service in the DC area has a decent BBB rating. #teamcharleyscraneservice

See, I'm exactly the opposite on that word. Just goes to show you, different strokes...

If gross was an argument, lima beans would be illegal.

Same. Pleasure. Regards.

I really wasn't trying to claim it was a slippery slope as in it's a bad thing. Just wished more people would at least acknowledge, in the two cases I presented, the same argument would hold. I don't really have an opinion other than I think incest is kind of gross. Okay, really gross. But that's just my opinion.

Fair enough, but it does become extremely nuanced and, in the appropriate circumstances, it appears you can at least acknowledge there is no overarching principal to legally prevent it entirely if we accept the same theory used to support gay marriage. And again, I want to stress that today was a good day for all…

I get the parent thing and the grooming/power issue. But what about siblings and cousins? What do we do with those folks?

I was going to say the same thing. There is really not a legitimate argument that can be made to deny three (or more) consenting adults from entering into a marriage. And I really don't see why they shouldn't be able to. A trickier question in my book has to do with incestuous relationships. There is an argument that…

So, Scalia doesn't think the data from 40 years ago should be used, but has no problem applying 40-year-old views on homosexuality to issues of gay marriage. Dick.