I thought it was 4? It's not many, but at least it's more than 0.
I thought it was 4? It's not many, but at least it's more than 0.
Oh no, I disagree. It's just pure dumb chaos. If anything I think the 'Slowing it down' episodes are the tougher re-listens.
I'm slowly working my way through it and it's been a delight. NNF is a podcast that's so consistent that it almost never gets talked about here, but I'm a fan - it's structured much more like a traditional radio show, and I'm not an enormous fan of anyone on the show, but the whole is much greater than the sum of the…
I just re-listened to all of Analyze Phish. I don't have a problem listening to the 2nd concert episode - well, okay, I guess I kind of did - but that final episode is pretty brutal. Harris does not sound like himself and Scott tells him that drugs were good for him. It's a pretty bad way for the show to have ended.
Even though I don't listen to The Dumbbells, it's always better when people who already have a podcast come on to WSGLL - they know how to do a decent podcast, so they obviously also know how to do a ridiculous one.
I don't think they were aware. On Analyze Phish in 2013 Scott was doing recreational drugs with Harris, and while the timeline is unclear on when Harris first went to rehab versus Scott and Scott recording the first 16 eps of UTU2TM (both happened sometime between 2013 and 2014, but it's only on Analyze Phish 9 in…
U2 is touring this summer, I assume they'll do an episode to review the concert. But maybe not.
I understand why Crashing's pilot had to be the way it was, but I would've liked to have seen more of their marital relationship - as a result, the series kind of has to tell, not show, what their life was like pre-adultery. That said, I did think that scene between Lapkus and Holmes where she tells him she's not in…
I haven't listened to Holmes's podcast (or him on DLM) in a long time, but It's to the point where I feel like that's Pete's phrase - watching this episode, I was like why is TJ doing Pete's bit
Yeah, this series is clearly set in 2017 - there's some jokes that indicate that, and Holmes's check from the comedy club is dated 2017 - which I think is kind of a mistake (are we supposed to assume that Holmes is like 30? Or even older?).
Part of me wonders what he could've done with something like Lapkus's podcast idea, although I think he probably pulls scenes too hard in his direction to be a guest on his own podcast every week. His appearance on that show is incredible, as we all know.
Aren't they running low on chains that are nationwide? I know they haven't reviewed McDonald's yet and I'm sure there's lots of LA-based chains left to review, but how many of these have a national footprint?
I feel like the show started to change when Scott stopped doing the CBB/CDR live showcase. There he saw people who were funny and invited them on the show, but he's since said that basically new people get on the show based on recommendations of other people. Those new people are going to be less inclined to take…
For me, even though I have been listening and enjoying (for the most part), I think I'm a little more indifferent towards new CBBs because I got spoiled with having 30+ episodes with the best guests last year.
That, and it sounded like scheduling studio time was a pain in the ass. I'm sure they ran the numbers on acquiring the necessary equipment and realized it makes more sense to record it somewhere where they control the time it happens.
Eh, that I'm less concerned about - even doing that twice a week isn't the worst thing if they're being healthy the rest of the week. Clearly Mitch when he's not dieting isn't doing that.
I don't know how I feel about ths Patreon. Reading between the lines of their most recent episode, it seems like Mitch was ready to throw in the towel on the whole thing unless he got some money for doing the show. Which, as a sometimes-working actor in LA, I don't blame him, and I will probably sign up for the…
The difference between the 'Asian' exchange and Holmes's comedy was confidence. The hack comedian was confident in what he was doing and had control of the stage - Holmes had zero confidence even though his material was decent.
I'm kinda burned out on Holmes - I stopped listening to his podcast a while ago - and I heard bits and pieces of this general story on his podcast. Likewise I'm kinda burned out on entertainment about comedians. So I was surprised to enjoy this too.
I think only one word describes this dialogue - 'presidential'