This is the road a mile west of town where the accident reportedly occurred. If you re-read the story above you’ll see tweets referencing “the two lane” where the accident happened.

Shit, you’re right! Sorry.

So then, “very” in that (A) the accident occurred at night and (B) it happened on an unlit rural highway and (C) the driver told the police that they thought it was a deer strike and (D) the driver left the scene of the accident and (E) the pedestrian was killed and (F) the driver had been at…

A) My dad had a Plymouth Arrow when I was a kid and I LOVED it.

I mean, I didn’t use the word “very” so I’m not sure how to answer your questions...

I successfully defended a woman in a very similar case. Polls of prospective jurors showed that they were pretty divided on whether they would have stopped on a dark rural road.

“YOU get a conviction, and YOU get a conviction... you ALL get a conviction!”

That’s their internet connection; it’s a series of tubes.

Nothing says “Attention to detail and sound engineering principles” like wheels with the wrong offset mounted too far outboard on spacers.

I do not understand your question.

I can’t remember the alphanumeric code.

I live in Santa Rosa, where the Tubbs Fire - the all-too-briefly Worst Fire Ever - happened in 2017. My family had to evacuate a couple times and over 5,000 houses - some a bare mile from mine - were destroyed in Santa Rosa alone. Cars and motorcycles and cats and dogs and livestock and 22 people were destroyed; it…

Well, this sucks. Stop fucking with things; it was fine the way it was.

Things change. I know, it’s complicated.

No.

My God, I love them.

If it matters, this isn’t the first kid treated this way.

I guess if you want an inherently unreliable car with a washed salvage title, this is the bomb.  I don’t want that, though.

That was a gorgeous launch and run.

Let’s all chip in and buy her a ticket on Kenya Airways.

As a ‘trial lawyer’ you ought to know better than to ask questions unless you know damn well what the answers are going to be. You also ought to know better than to frame a leading hypothetical based upon a flawed and incomplete understanding of the evidence.