your view, respectfully, presupposes these women were sitting around saying nothing and this was the last straw for them? Plus, none of them state he did anything horrible. He tried to kiss them, which "technically" fits the definition of sex assault, but no one would ever prosecute someone for in a million years.
lawdog
lawdog2303--disqus
They haven't been assaulted and they do not even say so. he tried to kiss them. Even if they are all telling the truth, he basically hit on them, they said no, and end of story. He didn't assault anyone and you would have to be stupid to think so.
he won the last one and everyone thought so. Keep drinking the Kool Aid.
he didn't brag about anything, he was shooting the crap with a friend, and these women really had nothing at all happen to the, He essentially hit on them and they turned him down, even if true. That is completely irrelevant to the issues and whether someone should be president. It is an October surprise stunt.
no, idiot. She is the one making accusations and she is proven to be a liar. In fact, I will bet 100$ all of them are lying. Just like you. Any accusation made by anyone against a candidate within one month of an election is almost automatically presumed false.
Geldof was not a very nice person who pretended to do nice things to cover for the fact he was not a very good person
LOL, you sound like PC Principal. People actually sound like this and talk like you in real life?? LOL
exposed himself to Paula Jones and asked for a BJ and he had to pay her $800,000. Which is worse? A kiss or exposing yourself and demanding oral sex and paying the woman $800,000 as proof you did it?
because its hypocrisy and wrong. If I said I cared, you would have just said then I should be against Trump. Its a second grade trap and an obvious trick question and a silly argument. nice try.
"We are hypocrites and proud because our person can win and that is all we care about, not women!"- 2016 liberal cheer
another brilliant comment who takes things literally, I was making fun of the belief Bill wouldn't have any power, I was not saying anything about Hillary. Man, people are dumb.
not really. Not because of the morality, but because it wasn't illegal. And I believed liberals like Bill Maher when I was young who said it was private and who cares? Now 20 years later, liberals suddenly care when its a republican and its rank hypocrisy.
yep, just dumb if that is what you got out of my comment
Then you are just dumb, what do you think he will be doing, playing Call of Duty in the White House while his wifey runs the country?
Its always interesting in listening to liberals call someone guilty of sex assault because some women (two already shown to be lying) says he tried to kiss them 30 years ago and conveniently say it three weeks before an election, with zero corroboration or evidence, but when Bill Clinton did it while president, they…
I found 60's something Sean Connery a little creepy when his main love interest was Catherine Zeta Jones (20's) in the day..but 40? Nah. Plenty of women like a slightly older guy. Its not an entitlement, its a reality, especially if the guy is successful. To me, its an "entitlement" if a guy thinks he should date…
Well, Eph is 40, not 60. (The actor is 40 too) In Hollywood, a woman should be glad she actually gets to do a love scene with a guy that young..LOL Personally, once a woman is over 25, I do not think any relationship is icky until the guy is over 50.
They showed him running out of there, so its like 100% he survived.
I explained his comment and what he meant. It was being intentionally misconstrued as he was attacking "consent". He wasn't. You may disagree with his statement, but he was expressly not saying you can rape women and consent is not needed, which is what these stupid commenters were saying.