Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    laurenleonardi
    LL
    laurenleonardi

    Well said. The ignorance of this article makes my eyeballs knock around in my head. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but Ms. Hatcher-Mays' makes a dozen overly confident, uninformed broad strokes in this article. I hope no one spouts her opinion in their own social circle without first properly educating

    I only have time to articulate two of the points you're missing:

    1) GMOs haven't been properly tested, so we don't know that there's "nothing wrong with them". They test rats for 3 months, then put GMO ingredients in *everything we eat* for our entire lives. Even most GMO opponents are open to the optimistic side of

    Enjoyed this. Very much.

    But that's the thing. What wide hips? She's photoshopped to half her size. Beyonce's thighs TOUCH. Each other. In the photo there's inches between them. I think an integral part of being a feminist is loving your body as it is, and not changing it into what other people think is beautiful. Jill Scott wouldn't let

    >>There's no feminism involved. So, there's really nothing to call bullshit on.<<

    Well said, iapprove.

    I don't disapprove of showing under boob, or wearing a thong, or being sexy loud and large. I do disapprove of acting like a woman who's role modeling feminism and "girl power" while at the same time allowing a magazine to photoshop you to half your size.

    I love me some Beyonce, but I call bullshit on her faux feminism. It might be a nice accessory that's on brand with her girl-power themes. But letting out her under-boob, and getting into her thong/s in a spread for an arguably sexist men's magazine is not exactly a feminist move. Also? The inner thigh photoshopping?