lau2012
Lau2012
lau2012

Okay then, obviously I was wrong! Please dismiss my previous “strange” comment as well as this one. Thank you.

Not a regular, so take this with a carton of salt: You may wish to change your lead image before you receive nasty-grams. Also, feel free to dismiss this remark, but please understand that I was only trying to be helpful.

Given his current position as the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, it appears to me (at least) that his recent behavior is nothing less than treasonous; which makes him a treasonous treasonor, wherein he has given classified information in addition to aid and comfort to the enemy, 45 (if you will but

Given his current position as the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, it appears to me (at least) that this(his) recent behavior is nothing less than treasonous; wherein he has given classified and confidential information to the enemy (if you will but allow my phrasing, as I am not an attorney nor am I

Also, some (so called) people are saying that a few of the pages will contain actual outlines of 45's very tiny hands and that a yuuge box of crayons (all the same color) will be available for sale, but only to children of the very rich.

Please accept this “Thank You” for your insight. Appreciations all around.

My thoughts are predicated on “the-way” and “the-tone” of how he(45) speaks about folks of color...(in my opinion) it’s absolutely disingenuous! Also, 45 has been a racist (all of his life), is a racist today, and will always be a racist, to the end (of his life).

Response to Question: From within Kinja, (on my Windows 10 computer) I (1) click “Reply”, then (2) click on the “Aa v” area (located to the extreme right-hand-side of your Kinja icon) to get the (Kinja) text emphasis (drop-down) ribbon, then (3) select the “strike-through” symbol AFTER highlighting the text you wish

Two posers (for you): (1) What if we had no (as in zero) political party associations but just had candidates for whatever office? (2) Would this approach (no associated political party) tend to eliminate the “(gang)team-affiliated” approach we now (seem to) have?

I always felt an allegiance to the political (gang)party for which I had registered; and therefore, I always voted for “that” party and for it’s representatives but not strictly for it’s issues. After a bit of thought, perhaps I might do better as an Independent.

A serious question deserves a serious answer, so: (1) I no longer wished to be associated with “that” party (2) I did not wish to vote for 45 (as the winner) (3) I had been receiving only my registered party’s voting materials and thought I could only vote as “that” party - and “only” for 45. My thinking may have been

I am clearly not one of the past five living presidents, nor was I ever president (of anything) and I actually changed (political) parties just so that I would not have to vote (legally) for our current (so-called) leader. Edit: Thank you 43 for your service as well as for your most recent statements (which I fully

A fastidious tooth-brushing daughter moved to and then married in(to) the UK; We sincerely approve of and appreciate your comment; thank you!

Thank you TAM. I suppose I was angling for another (outside) opinion; however, upon a re-reading of the above article, you are quite correct and therefore, I shall stand down and sit down.

Perhaps an attorney (or even a durn judge) familiar with this style of (police) identification methods and procedures might lend us a voice?

Winston apologized later for his sexist remarks. “During my talk, I used a poor word choice that may have overshadowed that positive message for some,” he told the Times.

Not a fan of the wifelet either; And I appreciate your re-cast of her name as “Melanoma”. Plus, it (the name “Melanoma”) works for him, even more so.

Thank you once again kind VonOhlnhausen; I shall copy and retain these(your) links for use in the future, as I’m certain others will appreciate them as well.

Thank you for this relevant information! Now do you happen to possess a link to a government website (which you might share) wherein I might read (for myself) about this costly happenstance?

A most-excellent question Matt. I searched Google but did not find a reasonable answer; perhaps my search queries were damaged or even defective (not unlike our current Grifter-In-Chief).