I don’t think you can “mostly” agree that something like reincarnation isn’t real. I don’t understand what “mostly” means in this respect.

That the author never questions the idea of certifying this pretend form of therapy is proof enough that she is not a skeptic. On what authority is this certification issued? Can it be revoked if, oh, I don’t know, people start experiencing future lives instead of past ones? Or if the concept of past life regression -…

“Pick up artist techniques help nervous guys go from talking to no women to some women.”

There is so much to mock in this article. The author is the exact opposite of the skeptic she claims to be and there are dozens of priceless quotes that demonstrate it. Being terrified by ghosts, for example, is not a good example of a skeptical outlook.