Thanks for posting this. I'm glad someone finally did.

Good points. :)

lol

Oh, I know. I completely agree with you. & I'll keep that in mind about Stewart, thanks. :)

Article after article, and shelling out $10k for unedited photos seems a bit like picking at her specifically, though.

PS Sorry for being white, but not sure what that has to do with me asking a rhetorical question.

I actually didn't know that, you're one of several to point it out to me. Thanks.

Meanwhile, they're handholding and frolicking with "JLaw" in every one of their daydreams. Lol.

I didn't know that about her, someone else just mentioned the same thing (I don't follow her or her show).

Did she? I don't really know anything about her, honestly, other than her name.

Maybe.

Maybe, but the paying $$$ for unedited photos of her seems very "mean girl." Why stick your neck out that far? It's sad and gross, I think.

Think so?

Uh, they've been writing snarky articles about her for months. The Photoshop one was just the most recent, most ridiculous one.

Their logic makes no sense, considering how many "JLaw is your/my/everyone's BFF OMG!" articles there are about how "relatable" she is.

They really do. I'm not a fan, but only because I've never seen her show or anything else she's done (I don't have HBO). She just seems like a woman? With a show? How dare she, I guess. Ha.

Why do you hate her so much, Jezebel?

That too. They could just as easily freak out on each other. :/

I'm surprised that's not already a thing, honestly. lol

I understand the sentiment of borrowable dogs on a beach, but I can see that so easily going terribly wrong. I went not too long ago with my furry friend, and another person's dog got their mouth around my leg! Wtf! I feel like dogs are much less predictable than cats in terms of destructive behavior that could…