laserjesusbeard
laserjesusbeard
laserjesusbeard

"However, as Jezebel reported, Faircloth had a long history of making contradictory statements online[...]"

Because the Williams sisters once said they could beat any man ranked below 200 and then lost to the 203rd ranked man on the same afternoon 6-2, 6-1. This kind of shit article is actually what ruins womens sports. My friends and I watch the womens World Cup with the exact same fervor and support as the mens. When

Ok so this guy is obvs a complete boil that needed to be and, thankfully, was lanced.

Capiche.

This is why I've given up speaking to people I find attractive. Now, I just carry a horn. Oddly, I'm doing about as well as I was before. AHWOOOOOOOOGA!

But it's not class neutral however. What if I want to play a non-armored, cloth wearing mage or healer?

That's called patriarchy.

Now playing

"There are far too many variables for a study like that to have statistical significance."

I have to avoid Japanese WW2/recent WW2 stuff after Barefoot Gen & Grave Of the Fireflies. If this is anything like as depressing as either of those. Noooope.

They're not Legacy of Kain games, that's all I care about.

she lied about it because she intended to harm him. Proving malice could be tricky: Why would she want to hurt Oberst? And why would someone lie about being sexually assaulted? What could be gained from that? Nothing, really.

This actually isn't true. You have to prove that it damaged him and that she knew it was a

Order or a tribe are not civilizations. Civilization started in two places about roughly the same time. Mesoptamia by the Sumerians, and the upper Nile by the Egyptians. Civilization is characterized by agriculture, organized religion, government, and specialized labor.

I wouldn't consider most factions in the game to

Having and displaying sexual preferences and attractions is not sexism. Molding one's fantasy figures in deference to those preferences and tastes is not sexism. If it were, every one of us would be guilty of "sexism" just by not sleeping with anyone who asks.

The "objectification" argument is nonsense, because these are not people. They are imaginary figures, literally fantasy objects. Explain to me, how in the name of fuck do you objectify an object?

Please refer to my reply to DerseDreamer.

I never claimed "all women" like anything. I explained the basics of secondary sexual characteristics as shown in male and female humans, in general, and stated that based on those that both male and female comic characters contain idealized or exaggerated displays of secondary sexual characteristics.

You and I have a very different idea of "fully clothed", apparently. Body paint masquerading as spandex does not qualify in my opinion. If the artist told you that Cyclops was wearing body paint and a belt in that image, would you be able to tell whether or not that was true? It might be colored in blue, but as far as

Yeah, this is bullshit and it's always been bullshit. It's cute, but ultimately meaningless.