Do you have any idea where the "fire in a movie theater" (actually, a crowded theater) line came from?

It came from a bullshit Supreme Court decision that found in favor of the government GIVING LIFE SENTENCES FOR ANTI-WAR ACTIVISTS PASSING OUT LEAFLETS AGAINST WORLD WAR I.

Yes. Yes, it is okay. There are clear laws regarding this, and throwing those out because you like to clutch your pearls does not make this a safer country.

James Heller from Prototype 2.

And you do? Fuck off.

This was the single worst fail I've ever seen, I think.

I'm sorry, but I have to jump in here. The "Know Nothings" weren't called that because they generally didn't know anything; that was in response to their distrust of media and questioning, and that when asked about activities of the party, they would say they "know nothing."

Folks like you don't learn your lesson. You make up your mind, once, and everyone either agrees with you, or is wrong. Facts are either in your favor, or irrelevant because "opinions." You don't live up to the very standards you used minutes before to bash others, and you endlessly split hairs and sidestep and ad…

I didn't even realize there were people who called them "jifs."

Not for nothing, but you're the reason why "people debating on the internet" has such a negative connotation.

I'd be so fascinated to find out just what is going on with you that that's what you read.

This is honestly the stupidest line of thinking.

If that's where you cut off your argument, then I can see the validity in your points and respectfully disagree with some of your conclusions.

Yeah, along those lines. Though more so - by taking away her responsibility for her choice, you're trying to carve a path that lets you both attack/shame the guys calling her sexy AND the outfit itself while leaving her pristine (which is more of a reflection of you - I fully agree she has the right to dress however…

That's my point. You're attributing her choice to greater factors and attacking the factors. It allows you to register your disgust without being called anything anti-woman by daring to impugn her choice. "No true Scotsman," ver. 2.0.

Agreed, but you use that as an escape to validate your worldview in the face of evidence. It's just your variation of the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. By claiming that other, insidious factors have played a role in a decision that a woman makes in dressing sexy, you're simultaneously attacking her CHOICE (sexy is bad!)…

Except you aren't talking about individuals, per se. You are talking about systems, forces at play. If you were talking about individuals, then you'd either be talking out your ass because you don't know this individual, or else you would BE her or someone intimate with her.

Same with criminals. INDIVIDUAL criminals…

Ahahahahahaha.

Why exactly does it "need to" have a female lead? I missed that part.

Thank you so, so much for this gif