That's my point. You're attributing her choice to greater factors and attacking the factors. It allows you to register your disgust without being called anything anti-woman by daring to impugn her choice. "No true Scotsman," ver. 2.0.

Agreed, but you use that as an escape to validate your worldview in the face of evidence. It's just your variation of the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. By claiming that other, insidious factors have played a role in a decision that a woman makes in dressing sexy, you're simultaneously attacking her CHOICE (sexy is bad!)…

Except you aren't talking about individuals, per se. You are talking about systems, forces at play. If you were talking about individuals, then you'd either be talking out your ass because you don't know this individual, or else you would BE her or someone intimate with her.

Same with criminals. INDIVIDUAL criminals…

Ahahahahahaha.

Why exactly does it "need to" have a female lead? I missed that part.

Thank you so, so much for this gif