laserfacefanclub
Laserface fan club
laserfacefanclub

This episode was better than last week’s unbearably preachy entry, but making a show that is constantly caving to the current anti-cop mindset really deprives the show of much of its fun and joy. “Every character basically says the “right” things (and it’s obviously better than spewing reactionary rhetoric)” I

How come you are bringing art style to a discussion table of technical processes?

There’s not a weird age difference. I guess it’s possible they got together at like 22 and 30, but even that’s not a recipe for disaster in itself. The power dynamic is also not a big deal, at least in isolation. Kinks are kinks. I don’t particularly like the idea of “owning and sharing” in Sub/Dom play, but I’m sure

It was fun, but I find myself wishing they had taken a little more care with the animation. The voices get lost with the lack of expression in the faces, I find. I wish it had more of that over-exaggerated style of a traditional cartoon (or maybe I just want it to be more like Avatar: the Last Airbender). The only

Considering Beetlejuice appeared in his namesake movie for only 17 MINUTES yet is considered his most indelible role says it all about Keaton.

I get a bit irritated whenever I see people talk about the episode as a “tribute” to Chadwick, like everyone knew he was going to die soon and this was supposed to be more than just one more appearance in the franchise.

but if she deleted her twitter because unhinged weirdos on that site would send death threats...and this is largely correct...does that not prove that the attitudes described in broad terms by “cancel culture” exist and are extremely poisonous?

When all feelings are valid this is where we end up. 

You make a great point, but I think you’re missing the moral absolutism creep (bordering on solipsism) that is driving these behaviors. People now in their 20s-40s grew up hearing absolutist discourse about obviously wrong/right social constructs like segregation, criminalization of homosexuality, etc. Now, they’ve

The allegation made it around the world 3 times before your update got its pants on.

It should be that simple, but it isn’t, because some of those offended people don’t take the rejection of their views and desires as well as they should. Some of them seek out and say cruel things to people involved with the work, or threaten them, or in rare cases, do worse. Some people don’t know how to take ‘no’

I believe in covering stories as you see fit but this is a saga I almost feel is better to not cover so the story can die. Review bombers and TUMBLUR folk are a small enough community that we can ignore their deeds and it’ll die out but maybe I’ve wrong.

Wat content warning do you put on a game for people like this?

I’m glad I’m not the only one noticing this. If this was an asshole dude making some dumb reaction post about ‘historical accuracy’ in shooters, Kotaku would have posted his name, address, medical records, and place of employment. Here they won’t even link to a specific post otherwise these nightmare goblins dregs of

Given how consistently this website runs bad faith criticisms and take downs of people accused of a litany of thought crimes, it’s amazing how you pull out the kid gloves when talking about idiots like this.

I mean sometimes I think stuff happened when I was 12 but I was actually 11 or 13. Maybe 1964 or 1966 instead then. This proves nothing.

Old enough to remember Doom clones. This isn’t a new phenomenon and Fortnite isn’t unique for copying fun game mechanics or gameplay.

Delicatessen is what you wanna watch.

We recently re-watched League and just at a guess I’d say Davis and Madonna are both on-screen at the same time (that is, actually in frame or clearly physically near one another in panning shots)... well, not very often, but there’s definitely a lot of scenes they’re both in. It’s likely they interacted quite a lot

What? You mean corporate exploitation? If so then yes. The Democrats as a party historically tend to also be fairly ok with it in general. If you mean all of the things the person said in the comment I was replying to, then no. The Republican runs with the other things to a much larger degree (hence why I only