Is there any way we could set up Disqus JUST for this thread so we could have an easy-to-follow conversation about this crazy thing we witnessed last night? Please? PLEAAAAASE?

It’s questionable whether Naido was actually Diane. The implication seems to be that Cooper enters the dream when he looks at Naido, and everything after that is Cooper’s dimension-hopping dream as directed by her. In fact I think we’re still yet to meet the real Diane.

I think it is really odd to leave Audrey like that unless they are leaving something open for another season. The two Coopers seemed to retain at least some of each other’s memories. So good Coop should know about Audrey the same way he knows about Diane. We know how strongly he felt about her so it is strange for him…

Just some random observations:

Here’s to hoping that the Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier book coming out next month will give us some answers.

Just looking at the scene for what’s there, it’s not pointless at all. That was the face of the man who raped her, if not the man himself, so it doesn’t surprise me that she covered it with her hands. It was an extremely vulnerable, uncomfortable scene, as it should have been and illuminated Diane’s psychology…

Personally, I think I really loved the ending. What was Twin Peaks about? Strip away all the lunacy and what was it about? It was about a dead girl and the FBI agent trying to solve her murder and thus symbolically save her.

I UNDERSTAND CELL PHONES NOW

Maybe it’s Baby’s First Critical Analysis to suggest that Twin Peaks: The Return is an extended meditation on both itself and the original run of episodes, but that’s the most coherent interpretation I have so far. I guess the only insight less piercing than that would be “Dale Cooper symbolically represents the…

this layout is shit

“That’s the world we live in now; it’s more violent, more chaotic, and less innocent than the world of 25 years ago.”

Twin Peaks speaks for us all...but its comments are pending.