I mean I’m actually in agreement that the rugby team shouldn’t have been suspended. But none of that happened because of “lies” contained in the Title IX complaint, and Hurley’s response wasn’t correcting any misconceptions regarding the team suspension. It was all on video, and that’s the action that the admin chose…

HAHAHAHAHA

....but they weren't.

Wait who is the innocent student being protected right now? The murderer whose rugby membership was in question? Somehow, something tells me that the question of his registration (or lack thereof) with USA Rugby is the least of his problems.

Wait until the decision comes out (those obvious falsehoods should ensure that the complaint will be thrown out) and if you feel like playing smart, leak the info about the rugby membership to the press. After that, you don’t even have to say anything, and you don’t look like a toolbag who is more interested in…

Yeah, attempting (although using misguided tactics) to make the campus a place where sexist rape jokes/songs are unacceptable hurts women more than all those fuckers at UMW joking about how they’d like to rape FUC members for speaking out. Makes sense.

You’ll be waiting a long time, because access to that evidence requires reading comprehension and critical thinking skills that seem to be beyond your current reach. (Evidence: “trying” to make the campus better is not the same as claiming that they are succeeding, yik yak vileness is but one piece of evidence that…

Cool, bro. Sounds good.

“We don’t know what/if they’re doing to try to reshape the culture.”

I don’t disagree, but just because one can exist without the other doesn’t mean that they don’t currently go hand-in-hand. You know? Like, can I imagine a world where there is no rugby singing about killing a prostitute and digging up her corpse to fuck it again? Yes, of course.

Yeah there was a lack of [good/intelligent] strategy in all of this.

well, song is actually pretty important / a huge part of the US college rugby experience, I must say. Can’t speak for anyone else.

Nobody’s arguing that he doesn’t “have the right” to write this. Douchenozzles on Yik Yak “have the right” to be disgusting human beings. FUC “has the right” to argue that campus culture somehow contributed to Grace’s death, if they believe it to be true.

Good Lord I am on team nobody here.

I always feel weird (idk some adjective like “ambivalent”) about these articles ONLY BECAUSE I feel like by dating a not-cis-man I experience a very unusual division of labor that apparently doesn’t even really happen among “feminist” or “progressive” straight couples.

WOOOOOOW I feel dumb!

Not according to USA Today sports >_>

Yeah, I think that there’s a difference between “confidence makes a big difference in whether you get sex or not!” and “confidence erases all disadvantages that fat people have in a society that says that fat people are gross, lazy, unloveable, inconsiderate, selfish, etc” and people are surprisingly bad about keeping…

yaAaAaAas I use this with everyone all the time and it really helps. if anyone’s interested, here’s a pay-what-you-can/pay-with-a-tweet ebook that is p great: http://www.guidetogender.com/

wait why is anal play included in this? like BDSM, cumshots, gangbangs require an understanding of nuance, fantasy vs reality, don’t actually be a sexist douchebag even if you roleplay one, etc. butt stuff? everyone has a butt, go ahead and check your butt out, use lube, etc.