Nice White Liberal reasoning; you chastise him because he’s a non-White person with a politically incorrect opinion piece about Islam in England.
Nice White Liberal reasoning; you chastise him because he’s a non-White person with a politically incorrect opinion piece about Islam in England.
Umm, no - it was Ghomeshi’s lawyer Marie Heinen that made that accusation. He did however agree with that assertion in his written decision.
I’m not sure if you read the decision in its entirety, but unlike a lot of decisions published by the Ontario Court of Justice (usually full of legalese), Justice Horkins seemed to have went out of his way to write his decision in plain English.
“Survivor” is a new term they use for victimhood that implies the validity of their victimization as a sure thing. Like, if we talk about all of us as being a survivor and limit the discussion to how this person is surviving, we eliminate the ability to question and discuss whether the person is even a victim because…
Justice Horkins is correct, and this case is a perfect illustration of this principle.
Most memorable excerpt from the Ghomeshi decision (para. 118-119):