ladeefrickenda
ladeefrickenda
ladeefrickenda

Wow. I can't believe that the message you got out of this was "why some people like erotic fan fiction."

You're right. Women of Color have a responsibility to make sure that they're seen as modest and ladylike, since they inhabit non-white and non-male. Because female modesty is in total opposition to patriarchy and has not been used to control what women do with their bodies. Cover up, ladies! /sarcasm

Yes, sadly some of us menfolk treat it like gold when it's really more like a stained Beanie Baby.

Because magazines don't care about women's boners. Our life's work is to make ourselves ever more appealing to men's boners, not enjoy our own sexuality!

Do you know how to deal with pussy overflow? Pussy waders. I'll show myself out.

As a short woman, the ankle length cut is perfect for me to have regular length jeans. Short length or petite is always just a smidge too short. So thank goodness for whoever made "cropped" an acceptable look.

Because there is a strong cultural conception that straight sex is "over" once the male has an orgasm. So, the logic goes, if the woman doesn't come first, she doesn't come at all.

I feel like 'skinny jeans' is either a catch all for hocking any sort of tight jean, as you said, or a catch all for hating any sort of tight jean.

The idea of ladies first in straight sex mystifies me. Why? To get it out of the way and get it over with?

I actually don't think this has much to do with it.

Not shocked. Beyond comfort and familiarity, I think a lot of the difference could be chalked up to the focus on mutual orgasm during intercourse. Same-sex couples engage in more turn-based sex, while straight couples tend to focus on each partner reaching orgasm during vaginal intercourse. Many women find it

ok, I'm going to give this one shot, what with 12 years of dating ( a variety of men, in a variety of flavors and walks of life, and in a variety of relationship types) and six years of marriage under my belt and all.

Thanks, Steve Harvey.

I feel like we already had this "well, it is parody but it is still shitty" discussion when "It's Hard Out Here for a Bitch" by Lily Allen came out. At this point, it is just redundant.

Also, the lack of pubes thing doesn't make any sense. As he says in his song: "And every last inch of me's covered with hair!"

Ah. I see. You have a penis and you are offended by seeing sexualised images that convey that certain male bodies are permissible and other male bodies are only shown as a joke.

I've slept with that guy. We've all slept with that guy.

i think the point is that you voluntarily clicked a link that promised dicks; encountering porn in a comments section of an unrelated article is not voluntary

Yes, I think you're missing something — a sense of perspective. It's just drawings of naked men. It's not the same as a rape image. It's not even close.

you can easily find that on the internet right now, bro