Yep, in the 90s when Steam didn’t exist and the Internet was in its infancy unlike now making digital media more accessible, which completely removes the majority of the overhead previously tied into selling games.
Yep, in the 90s when Steam didn’t exist and the Internet was in its infancy unlike now making digital media more accessible, which completely removes the majority of the overhead previously tied into selling games.
Yep, in the 90s when Steam didn’t exist and the Internet was in its infancy unlike now making digital media more accessible, which completely removes the majority of the overhead previously tied into selling games.
Yep, in the 90s when Steam didn’t exist and a large portion of sales weren’t digital, which completely removes the majority of the overhead previously tied into selling games.
Yet somehow games release with live services and plan future development based on normal pricing and not with micro-transactions.
No, if every game did this people seriously wouldn’t be talking about this game doing this lol.
The Xbox not selling as well as other consoles doesn’t have anything to do with Microsoft providing games on PC and consoles, but rather the fact that it’s a service they can offer much more easily than Sony or Nintendo. They’re still promoting the concept of playing a game on PC and then moving over to console…
It sounds like they setup the game to sell DLC more so than they have before considering the things lacking. Which makes complete sense when they gave the game away for nothing.
No I’m seriously asking you what “serving your country” by joining the US military means to you. Going off to fight endless wars so the military industrial complex and politicians can get rich off of it isn’t serving your country. There’s literally nothing endangering our “liberties” as you put it that we haven’t…
Just curious, what meaningful way would someone be serving their country by joining the US military?
This is ignorant at best. The average gamer is in their 30s, and assuming that just because kids watch twitch and stupid shit is popular on twitch it must be the kids watching is pretty damn ignorant when people are dishing out thousands of dollars to streamers. You really think kids/teens are paying for that?
This is ignorant at best. The average gamer is in their 30s, and assuming that just because kids watch twitch and stupid shit is popular on twitch it must be the kids watching is pretty damn ignorant when people are dishing out thousands of dollars to streamers. You really think kids/teens are paying for that?
They flat out lied about features in the game, yet here you are claiming it’s the gamers fault. Somehow I feel if EA did the same you wouldn’t feel the same way.
Uh no, No Man’s Sky fucked up big time and they have no one to blame but themselves for it. People weren’t overreacting to literally being lied to by the developers.
Correction, SOME dispatch has the technology. It’s going to be dependent on how well funded they are, and needless to say, lower income areas aren’t going to have that kind of advantage.
That’s awful, especially when 90% of the broadcast is behind the pitcher or shots of the batter.
After years of watching baseball it’s off putting, to say the least, to watch professional teams with literally no one in a stadium made for 20,000 people. A broadcaster recently pointed out why and I think it’s actually funny. Because baseball is so slow you end up watching some of the crowd in the down time.
Days Gone was another, and between that Horizon Zero Dawn and Spiderman I think they relied far too much on old formulas in a “new” package.
No offense, but you’re a big part of the problem with the current nature of sexual harassment. The power differential between two people creates a huge conflict regardless of whether it’s intentional or not. This is actually how the majority of sexual harassment cases develop, when one person has power over…
Firstly, I stated that I’m all for giving developers the freedom of creativity they desire. My point is that that freedom isn’t always hampered by attempting to use a person of color in a prominent role.
Yes, an exclusion. Not necessarily an intentional exclusion, but an exclusion nonetheless. As well, just because you don’t feel the need to be more represented, your anecdotal evidence doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be more people of color in prominent roles in video games.