Because they can afford to be, obviously. What kind of question is that? Take a look at celebrity culture.

OK. I’m a libertarian of sorts. I have a proposition. You pick the topic and define the terms of the conversation, which we can have right in this space. One rule:

let’s play a game.

incredibly stupid

check this out!

it’s hilarious that that’s how you think that would go

Except you haven’t. No one has the right to a particular platform or a particular place to speak.

nobody cares about middlebury, people care about murray and free speech.

christ. nothing overly“academic” about it in the sense you mean. high schoolers have read Bolt for decades; it’s very straightforward

large portions of this are colossally stupid

“our arguments”

no no

Yes, the classic “Nazis are people too, man” argument. We aren’t talking about differing opinions on pineapple on pizza, we’re talking about whether or not someone has the right to exist or if they should be subject to state violence.

Yes, it warrants refutation. First of all, here’s the full quote, which you should have included:

“when a bigger Nazi comes along afterwards and punches you in the face, you can’t complain about it”

AH POOP SWASTIKA

Do you think that if Kawhi stopped expending as much energy on defense; had the ball in his hands twice as much; took eight more shots a game; and serially stole his big men’s rebounds (those guys fuckin feed their families behind those boards, Russ!), he couldn’t average 30 on 42% shooting?

PER? You may as well use PPG.

trump supporters are livid, he might have set WW3 in motion yesterday

nothing racist about sharing my experience