l1l1l1l1l1ll1l1l1l1l1
l1l1l1ll1l1ll1l1l11l1l1
l1l1l1l1l1ll1l1l1l1l1

There’s also real life humans who are excited at the prospect of a Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton Presidency!

He’s referring to Gawker’s slow-motion implosion as layoffs and cuts loom.

Ah, Chatroulette.

False! The earth is FLAT! don’t buy in to NASA’s rediculous “round earth” agenda!

I am so going miss them after next January.

You won’t get a straight answer. These are the same people who have been arguing all day that Belgian civilians deserved to be murdered because their government provided token assistance in the fight against ISIS.

“She can do whatever the fuck she wants or embrace whatever policy she wants, she’ll still have my vote in November”

Help me understand this. I’ll apologize in advance for the long reply as this may not even be directed towards you. I am a long standing repub/conservative (catholic upbringing) recently thinking socially progressive (I’m somewhat young, 28, I’m getting there and help me understand) reading this article with questions

If he had those diagnoses, or at least documented symptoms, before the murder, it would (or at least should) be more. Ever hear of the mad/bad/sad theory? This guy was one of the mad ones.

“The crime for which Mr. Ward received the penalty of death was an act inextricable from the delusions and paranoia fed by his disabling bipolar disorder” Said his lawyers.

In a very clear cut case of murder, where is no chance of getting the wrong person...I’m perfectly fine with this.

Clinton is not a democrat.

You make a good point, and it’s pretty unforgivable of Clinton. It tarnishes his legacy. But Clinton, varying only in degrees from a lot of Obama’s policy decisions now, was bound and determined not to be made to look weak on certain issues and risk losing election (or re-election) as result of a Willie Horton

Nope. I read that. But whereas you’re saying this off-handedly as if they’re just some side-effect of racist, neo-conservativism, I’m making it explicit that it doesn’t take an “evil” right winger to initiate stances on anti-blackness.

And, no, I’m not arguing whether Clinton and Reagan are comparable or that private prisons caused the incarceration crisis. My only point is that non- right wingers “reap the benefits of anti-blackness.”

Your last point is certainly taken and I think supersedes any other discussion.......... but I still feel like it’s worth pointing out that comparing Clinton to Nixon is pretty unfair.

Pin this on the Republicans all you want, Dems played on this fear of black criminality as well. Private prisons skyrocketed beginning in Clinton’s era. Federal sentencing got tougher and continued to be discriminatory as well.

And invest heavily in Nabisco, Little Debbie and Hostess.

Take Mary Jane off the Schedule I list and watch crime fall like leaves in October.