It’s important to understand that, with a device like the Game Boy, you’re not emulating scan lines. The Game Boy didn’t have a CRT screen, it had an early LCD screen. The pixels on the GB screen were much larger than current screens, and didn’t connect, meaning that there is a slight gap between pixels on the GB…

“your ability to negotiate all your own working conditions will be turned over to CWA, just as the document says”

Wait, are you saying that you are against car safety laws, because drivers should just driver better instead of having accidents? That’s the weirdest take I’ve seen in a long time.

Not allowing the driver of a car to play videogames has literally NOTHING to do with data collection, or employers surveilling their employees. What in the heck are you going on about.

“Why tf is Kotaku pushing this Tech-Big-Brother-Good B.S.?”

Or, alternatively, some new inventions actually do suck.

What?

Well, at least now you admit that you’re the kettle. Which, again, just proves my original point.

Well, now at least we can see how thinking that it is totally great to insult others translates to your own online behavior. I think you just accidentally proved me right.

No, you’re right, belittling people in public is much better. I apologize for missing that obvious fact.

The Ornithopters were the coolest thing in the whole movie. Obviously, they’re not realistic, but, I mean... it’s a movie about a universe where computers are outlawed and humans are genetically engineered to eat spice mélange, so they can push spaceships through fold space or something, so maybe let’s not draw the…

I’m not actually an asshole, I’m just “purposefully belittling” is a great excuse that I’m sure will work very well for me in the future in my everyday interactions with my fellow humanoids.

I feel like I read a different article. I haven’t played Halo, and likely won’t, so I really don’t care either way, but Zack’s description of the game, as much as there even was one, seemed pretty neutral here, and I didn’t see much of a defense of the studio that made the game, just a plea not to personally attack…

As a critic, I acclaim A Way Out, which makes it critically acclaimed.

There are situations where it is highly advisable for a trademark owner to actively defend their trademark in situations that aren’t direct infringements (for example, to prevent it from becoming genericized, which will make it harder to defend the trademark in the future, if there is an actual infringement).

I generally prefer smaller packages for sweets. I often avoid buying this stuff, precisely because the packages are so big that it seems unreasonable for one person to consume inside an acceptable timeframe.

Okay, I think I now get what you’re saying, and why you’re comparing this to earlier cases. I think the distinction you’re drawing is between “are we decompiling it, fixing the symbols, adding the includes so everything compiles, and then publishing that.” I think that’s clearly illegal. IMO, that’s like zipping a…

“Why does Gimp exist? Because the whole point of Gimp is that it is open source and available for anyone to see the source code and make additions to the software. It’s made specifically to be the antithesis to Photoshop”

“Nobody likes Windows enough”

In a capitalistic society, scalpers aren’t even really a problem. They provide a service to rich people, who can just buy consoles directly, instead of having to wait in line like everybody else.