Amen.

"This rumor is so ridiculous that it doesn't need commentary or this rumor is so ridiculous that it doesn't need commentary." So either A or A?

I seem to remember them doing something like that on Eureka and the results were not good.

@Hal: Like there are no ads today that make you look at it for ten minutes trying to figure out what the f*&K it is all about? Please....

So it is Wifi capable?

Old news.... very old news.

What happens if you loan a friend your phone?

@paperless: Do you really come her for good journalism?

@big_dave501: Tried to delete other comment but could not. I did not see the other comment when I posted. I would not have repeated the same point if I had.

@big_dave501: Other reply was not there when I replied. Sorry for the repetition. Older replies are generally on the bottom of the page where new ones are on top. That being said we could have replied at the same time.

@big_dave501: Unless murder is considered a non-violent offense it would not qualify for the program. Come on, read the article! "...can now allow officials to closely monitor

@Ross Lewis: Does anyone read the articles before spouting an opinion? This would only go with "non-violent" offenders. Even armed robbery would not qualify as far as I understand.

@fragMasterFlash: This would not apply to muggers. ..... they said "non-violent" crimes.

@Fourdagon: I believe they did mention something about scaling back prisons for "non-violent" criminals. So the rapist, murders, etc would not qualify for such a program.

@jammywoley: Yes, I would agree that the element of the Referee's call, is very much a part of the game. That being said, I would not be against use of the technology if it were limited to say one use per half.

@RigAudio: For one I can see the new technology applied to an offsides call. Did the player get back onside before the ball was snapped? You can look at the chip log to see if the ball moved backwards before or after he returned onside.

I would also question the effectiveness of this technology. In the case of the ball breaking the plane of the end zone. Would the technology be so accurate that it would not be triggered when the ball approached, but did not break, the line? Where would the chip be placed? Would it be in the center of the ball or…

Refs are part of the game. Sometimes a bad call happens and the game goes a different way than expected. Sometimes the call goes your way and sometimes not. This is part of the game. The same goes for a player missing a catch or fowling up a kick.

Some one explain how this would work with COD? The D-pad would either control the character walking around or aiming. It can not do both. Then what do you shoot with with out the trigger buttons?

"he issue's just now coming to ahead overseas." That would be " to a head" not "ahead". #Corrections.