But you don’t know shit about the accuser. Maybe she’s a drama queen who makes stuff up all the time. We simply don’t know, we only have the evidence at hand. To say someone is probably a rapist because they’ve been an asshole in the past is a real leap.

Wow, the amount of lies and misinformation being spread on this story is amazing. People literally saying down is up and red is blue. “Women get sentenced to death more often than men! Women get harsher sentences than men!” Lies. The complete opposite of both of those statements is true.

arguing that he did it because he has been a crap person in the past is basically the same thing as concluding a rape victim wasn’t raped because she’s slept with a lot of people in the past.

I am absolutely not saying he didn’t do it, however there is definitely something fishy going on here. Patrick Kane is a piece of trash and there are plenty of reasons for everyone to believe that, but just as we shouldn’t allow people to say “oh she couldn’t have been raped because she’s a slut”, we also shouldn’t…

Must have raped her so.

He probably did it why? Is there a shred of evidence?

butbutbut misogynyyy!!!

Statistically, men get harsher sentences than women for the same crimes. The issue expressed in this article isn’t about initial judgement, it’s about stays being extended after the juvenile is already incarcerated.