kthomp1123--disqus
kthomp1123
kthomp1123--disqus

You're soooo smart, so clever.
So high society.

She won't accept it because she is locked in a horrible contract. Plus her steam was running out and they were promoting other artists. I have a feeling she decided to go scorched earth to get out of it which this was part of originally. It was never about the abuse as much as it was more about getting out of a bad

You have to remember that Dr Luke has a catalog they partially own. If they fire him it gets very complicated. Even for Kesha, who also has a portion of ownership of the catalog. As long as Sony controls the catalog they have power over what he does with it. If they don't have power he could put it on every Kesha

A lot of the time ending these contracts for cause opens up ownership of the catalog, which Sony doesn't want to lose. He has power in his catalog…everytime a Kesha song is played, they get paid. They can put her with anyone and make a hit (especially now) but him, well, him he's not on the same level. But, if they

Contracts means money to these labels. These are horrible contracts. I think Kesha would have gotten further if she would have had another label buy her out. A lot of labels will sign people who are up and coming competitors to their signed artists to shelve them. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. This

Hey, Spirrrro, been a while!

I was always taught ya'll because it's the plural of ya. How's that for southernism….

Ok, I can see where you applied the logic. I don't agree with it's application but I understand it.
But, justice has to be devoid of empathy in a lot of ways - it has to have no emotion, it has to be based on evidence. If we allow the court of public outcry, or empathy, to sway justice, she's no longer blind or

It was a clever observation, so no apology needed!

OJ was criminally innocent and civilly liable. He was found civilly liable for the wrongful death because of the preponderance of the evidence. Preponderance of the evidence is civilly based, where you look at the quality of the evidence, not the amount.
So, that's an interesting question - my personal opinion is he

Not sure where to use the [ ] in that situation, and I'm actually curious. It's like when people spell y'all versus ya'll. Is it y, all, or ya, plural…

Ok, so I will take this one seriously because you wrote some interesting points.
What he has been accused of is a criminal act. This is not a civil act, where he could lose money in a judgement, but a criminal act, where he could lose his freedom. Since she did not choose to go the police and report him it instead

Wouldn't it be control[ling]?

Very logical and true.

thank you for your reply.

Did it pretty easily - the name calling from the inability to make arguments by most of the people here started pretty quickly, which means people began to see their logic break up slightly so they reverted to the usual nonsense. Plus I had a few upvotes, someone spend 30 minutes trying to find something I've said to

Here's to you never having a jury of your peers make a judgement on you…

Just read it again - he's been criticised by Kelly Clarkson - but no mention of anyone else claiming he's abused them. Kelly walked back her comments on Twitter about how she was made to work with him. So, your chair has no legs.

LOL - you're so naive it's almost hilarious.
Almost.

Glad you think I'm adorable - I like white chocolates and I'm more of a daisies kind of guy if you're interested….