Barclay’s announced today that ANYONE that had anything to do with this shit show will see a minimum of a 40 percent reduction in earnings this year.
Kjetil
kskjon
If musk was truly against this, I’m sure Tesla could remotely brick the CT.
I can’t wait to see the big, bada boom this thing lets loose once it encounters a drone
Okay, now we really need to send an A-10 to Ukraine just to see how the Cybertruck holds up to a GAU-8 firing DPU rounds at it, for science of course.
It is only Monday, but I have already seen the stupidest thing of the week...
Ukraine military is probably praying that Russia sinks all of it’s military funding into chubbertrucks! They’ll get stuck in the first muddy spot they hit and get bricked by a strong rain storm.
The nice thing about this is, is that once it meets its first obstacle the Ukrainians will have a nice, stationary target.
“We would like to buy a Tesla.”
I would expect that 95% of the time you’re charging at home, over night, at a moderate pace.
How much longer does it take when you factor in the drive to/from the gas station? It only takes me less than 20 seconds of additional time to fuel my car because I just plug it in when I get home.
It was creepy, but not surprising, when Trump started talking up EVs recently after Musk’s contribution. The fact that he basically said that he changed his stance based on Musk’s support is pretty frightening if you’re looking to avoid a full blown (more than we have now) oligarchy.
The cognitive dissonance on display with that “you can’t not-advertise on my platform” lawsuit from a “free speech absolutist” is truly breathtaking.
He’s counting on Trump winning and ordering that every single federal government vehicle be junked and replaced with a Cybertruck to put money in Elon’s pocket at the taxpayers’ expense.
I will not be surprised when Musk starts suing people that canceled their orders because it violates his free speech rights to support an orange asshole.
They won’t tell you this, but if you plug a CT into 480V it will not only charge in half the time, but go twice as fast afterward. Such a hack.
NHTSA incoming, cars that catch fire get recalled. Of course Toyota will fight, and loose.
If you are not supposed to drive over 85, why doesn’t Toyota govern it for 85? I’m sure there is a rev limiter on the engine. Do you void the warrantee if you rev over 4,000 RPM even if it is not rev limited to something like 6,000? If you slam on the brakes to avoid a crash, is that abusive? This seems like BS from…
Hey... Look at that... Another reason that the only Toyota’s I’d consider buying are pre-2005 or made by BMW... and that’s saying something, because... BMW. What an absolute shame to see.
I guess Toyota should stick to boring sedans.