It’s a beauty indeed. It’s like we stopped making sexy, curvy warplanes with the B-1 bomber. Everything else is now so angular (and ugly).
It’s a beauty indeed. It’s like we stopped making sexy, curvy warplanes with the B-1 bomber. Everything else is now so angular (and ugly).
Looks like a little radio inside a bigger radio!
Agreed. What a turn-off in an otherwise awesome truck!
YES. THIS. Finally I find someone who agrees with me
Actually, the LS is good only because it’s physical size and weight are good relative to the engine displacement you can achieve.
Ok, so you’ve picked the one vehicle that would be worth owning from Chrysler. The rest of it continually ticks the bottom of the retained value (wranglers notwithstanding) and the trade-in/reliability under age report.
If you are actually considering buying one of their fit-for-rental-only quality shitboxes, you get…
Oh come on. I mean the NSX is a great looking car but those wedges and angles show it’s age like wrinkles, and furthermore I wouldn’t call it beautiful. Striking, aggressive, yes. But not beautiful.
Who else thinks this will be worse than TG:US?
High school girlfriend had one. Can confirm.
HUHHHHHHHHHHHHH, ehhhhHUUHHHHHHH-ing.
i second this.
As a Sportwagen TDI owner I’m just going to brush it off. I like my car the way it is now and I’d prefer not to do the recall, however if there is an incentive I may, depending on the offer/how much my performance is compromised. Truthfully, I’m otherwise so happy with the car that if they offered to buy it back I…
You mean an AMG GT? That’s what the internet tells me. :p
Just because you don’t need something doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have it. We don’t need powerful cars, but we still like to have it. For me the missing grill is irritating because we have become so used to seeing grills on cars.
I had trouble finding a picture of one that didn’t get the low-rider or donk treatment!